Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Advice wanted on Player Vs Player Situation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chris633" data-source="post: 7308149" data-attributes="member: 6779018"><p>Hi everyone, I’ve encountered an interesting dilemma running Rise of Tiamat which actually has nothing to really do with ROT. Some background first: This is a longtime group with relatively mature players. No problem players. At the end of hoard of the dragon queen, a player playing a necromancer (with connections to the cult of the dragon) left the group. That player’s PC ended up becoming a villain later in the campaign. That player was replaced with someone who also decided to play a necromancer (this was well over a year ago). Player definitely plays his character more neutral with flashes of good. I wouldn’t consider him to be playing an evil PC even though he is a necromancer.</p><p> </p><p>So here is the situation. Another player has told me privately that his PC (Harry) has decided that the necromancer-PC (Derek) needs to die. He is a future problem that needs to be solved now. Strike one is that he is a necromancer. Strike two was creating a small force of undead by killing non-evil though non-humanoid creatures (frogs—don’t ask, he has weird ideas and likes experimenting). Strike three was soliciting volunteers to be experimented on in a city (He was attempting cognitive enhancements and transfer of abilities). The volunteers were not the smartest to begin with and may have suffered some brain damage—hard to tell. The other PCs, which includes a paladin, have not taken issue with Derek’s behavior. Harry is a rogue who is trying to reform and use his skill set on bad people. </p><p> </p><p>So Harry plans to kill Derek the next time they stop for the night. I’ve decided to let it play out. They are mature players and I think they can handle this. This is also my first time dealing with this kind of situation. Should I tell the other player what is going to happen next time we play? I am thinking that I should. The PC will get broadsided by this, but maybe the player shouldn’t. Or should I just not tell him and let it play out?</p><p> </p><p>And just for a little perspective—We are at the end of ROT. They will be doing the final Council meeting before the finale after this gets resolved. Though maybe not depending on where this goes.</p><p> </p><p>Thanks in advance for any advice!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chris633, post: 7308149, member: 6779018"] Hi everyone, I’ve encountered an interesting dilemma running Rise of Tiamat which actually has nothing to really do with ROT. Some background first: This is a longtime group with relatively mature players. No problem players. At the end of hoard of the dragon queen, a player playing a necromancer (with connections to the cult of the dragon) left the group. That player’s PC ended up becoming a villain later in the campaign. That player was replaced with someone who also decided to play a necromancer (this was well over a year ago). Player definitely plays his character more neutral with flashes of good. I wouldn’t consider him to be playing an evil PC even though he is a necromancer. So here is the situation. Another player has told me privately that his PC (Harry) has decided that the necromancer-PC (Derek) needs to die. He is a future problem that needs to be solved now. Strike one is that he is a necromancer. Strike two was creating a small force of undead by killing non-evil though non-humanoid creatures (frogs—don’t ask, he has weird ideas and likes experimenting). Strike three was soliciting volunteers to be experimented on in a city (He was attempting cognitive enhancements and transfer of abilities). The volunteers were not the smartest to begin with and may have suffered some brain damage—hard to tell. The other PCs, which includes a paladin, have not taken issue with Derek’s behavior. Harry is a rogue who is trying to reform and use his skill set on bad people. So Harry plans to kill Derek the next time they stop for the night. I’ve decided to let it play out. They are mature players and I think they can handle this. This is also my first time dealing with this kind of situation. Should I tell the other player what is going to happen next time we play? I am thinking that I should. The PC will get broadsided by this, but maybe the player shouldn’t. Or should I just not tell him and let it play out? And just for a little perspective—We are at the end of ROT. They will be doing the final Council meeting before the finale after this gets resolved. Though maybe not depending on where this goes. Thanks in advance for any advice!! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Advice wanted on Player Vs Player Situation
Top