Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Shiroiken" data-source="post: 7308163" data-attributes="member: 6775477">There are two schools of thought: DM as neutral arbiter, and DM as story enforcer. You should normally have this stuff figured out well in advance (session 0), and I'm surprised it's taken this long for an issue to come up. I'd suggest you consider the following views, and see which one is closest to the way you and your group view the game. Obviously these are the extreme ends, with most sitting somewhere in the middle.DM as neutral arbiter. The DM provides plot hooks and controls NPCs/monsters, nothing more. The players are free to act as they see fit, including against one another. The DM is not to interfere, serving only as an impartial judge to narrate the outcome of the actions and dice rolls of the involved players. DMs who do this are generally more old-school, often running sandbox type games that are player driven.DM as story enforcer. The DM has a plot, and shall interfere with player activity that strays from said plot. The players must abide by table rules set by the DM (usually negotiated with the group during session 0), including how much PvP behavior is acceptable (it must be plot related). The DM may intercede, including forcing player actions if needed, to keep the game on track. DMs who do this normally are running epic stories, such as Adventure Paths, where the players need to remain focused on the story.Since you are running RoT, I'm guessing your game is probably closer to the second. No matter which way you go, you should explain to Harry how you plan to handle it, so that he can be ready. I would suggest you allow everything to go exactly as Harry desires (DM as arbiter) until he goes to actually murder Derek. Pause the game at that point, and speak with the group as a whole. Ask them if they feel that the players should have complete agency, or if the focus should remain on the plot. If the majority of the group (other than Harry and Derek) agree, and it's not a deal-breaker for anyone, go with the majority. If it's a deal-breaker, then everyone is going to have to compromise somewhere.</blockquote>

Verification