Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="eayres33" data-source="post: 7308823" data-attributes="member: 6808932">My first question would be is what was the discussion of possible PVP in session zero, was conflict resolution between players ever discussed? If it was and this was a possible outcome I would go with what was discussed there.I take it from this post that potential PVP was not discussed.  If that is the case I echo iserith’s method, tell the player that wants to start the PVP that if the other player is not notified that player dictates how the confrontation ends, then give the first player the option of discussing the situation with the second player and seeing if they can come to a resolution or at least create terms to have the PVP fight that both agree to beforehand. Also I will have to agree that unless Harry had shown some signs of this growing hatred of Derek’s character then Derek should be given the opportunity to make an insight check, or have Harry make several deception checks.  Also if he attempts to kill him while he sleeps where are Derek’s minions? They would not stand by as someone killed him in his sleep, as these are higher level character’s it would be hard to see a one shot kill. Also among many other issues, why is Harry’s character doing this before the battle is won, to take out a powerful alley close to the eve of the main battle is folly, unless Derek is more powerful than Tiamat the bigger question isn’t whether this is in character or fair but rather why wouldn’t the group, and then the council kill Harry’s character for jeopardizing the greater mission?</blockquote>

Verification