Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 9383385" data-attributes="member: 12731">A fighter is MUCH more viable in 5E than in 3E.Maybe it's not enough for you to play one, but the improvements are definite and the disparity is small enough for me to say fighters are definitely pulling their weight in a 5E party.Remember; in 3E a single-classed fighter were a joke.Plus, I suspect actual parity between casters and martials is much less popular and desired than you appear to assume.If a fighter can do just as many varied and wondrous things as a magic users, well, then almost by definition magic would feel... much less magical.ZappPS. If behind your posts you are secretly longinging for a 4E style martial-caster parity, not saying you are, then let's simply disagree and end it there. I'm glad the majority of D&Ders rejected that approach if you ask me.</blockquote>