Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deset Gled" data-source="post: 8541366" data-attributes="member: 7808">You are completely correct that very little hard evidence has been released, and the constant hinting at more coming out soon doesn't seem particularly trustworthy.  However, I can confirm that at a first check, all of the names, dates, and times from screenshots seem to coincide very closely with other confirmed activities.  There are many small details (all the players, people's personal histories, collaborations outside of NuTSR, etc) that match up perfectly with other minor things that are public.  All combined, the information in the barrage of tweets isn't just something you could throw together in a day; it's a well woven tapestry of the story that's been going on for months.  It's definitely been done by someone who knows the NuTSR stoy well and has been documenting things for a long time.One of the things that I have found particularly weird about following the NuTSR saga is that nothing that comes out of their mouths ever matches up.  From one interview to the next media post to the next product teaser, the story is always some strange amorphous blob of un-truths.  Try to find out about SFNG, for example, and the details about what system it uses, when it will be released, and who is involved just keep changing every time they say something new.  It's infuriating, because they lie or are ambiguous with answers even when it seems there's no reason to skirt the truth.  There are dozens of time I have thought: "It's so obvious that isn't true, why would you even bother lying about it?"  The pieces of the puzzle just never match up.OTOH, the details of RevenegeChad all line up very, very nicely.  It matches everything I have personally seen.  Is that proof it's real?  No.  But it does make him feel a lot more trustworthy than anything that comes from an official NuTSR spokesperson.  I am eagerly awaiting more information.</blockquote>

Verification