Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Alright already!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JohnSnow" data-source="post: 4105563" data-attributes="member: 32164"><p>I agree, and I haven't even tried running any 4e sessions yet. However, I did read the review posted by Massawyrm over on <em>Ain't It Cool News</em>, and one thing stood out.</p><p></p><p>He was running an encounter for his group, and his game designer buddy (or GDB for short) - incidentally the person who got them into the 4e playtest - pulled out something...unexpected. A couple of toughs were standing on top of a table, and GDB goes: "I'm going to slide under the table and overturn it. How do you plan to handle THAT, DM?" In his review, Massawyrm comments that he stopped and thought, and then said "Strength Check vs. their Reflex Defense," causing GDB to smirk...because that, of course, is how the game is apparently intended to work. And the game moved on from there.</p><p></p><p>My guess is that's part of the "open-ended" rules Mike Mearls alluded to. And if they're spelled out, even partially, that opens up a wide variety of on-the-fly stunts for players. For example, if you read the quick-start rules that (I believe) Keterys posted, "grappling" is now as simple as any other attack check - you just make a Strength Check vs. your opponent's Reflex defense. If you succeed, he's grappled, and certain conditional effects come into play. Bull rush? Strength Check vs. Fortitude. And so on. To address Kamikaze Midget's point above, I imagine a very basic "trip" works the same way. It's just some kind of check vs. Reflex to knock the guy prone...probably without all the benefits in damage and what-not from your per-encounter power...but it's there nonetheless.</p><p></p><p>With rules like that, I doubt we'll see any serious problem of the characters spamming their at-will powers A, B, A, B... ad nauseum, with the occasional encounter or daily thrown in for variety. No. I predict combat will instead be a smorgasbord of delicious variety...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JohnSnow, post: 4105563, member: 32164"] I agree, and I haven't even tried running any 4e sessions yet. However, I did read the review posted by Massawyrm over on [i]Ain't It Cool News[/i], and one thing stood out. He was running an encounter for his group, and his game designer buddy (or GDB for short) - incidentally the person who got them into the 4e playtest - pulled out something...unexpected. A couple of toughs were standing on top of a table, and GDB goes: "I'm going to slide under the table and overturn it. How do you plan to handle THAT, DM?" In his review, Massawyrm comments that he stopped and thought, and then said "Strength Check vs. their Reflex Defense," causing GDB to smirk...because that, of course, is how the game is apparently intended to work. And the game moved on from there. My guess is that's part of the "open-ended" rules Mike Mearls alluded to. And if they're spelled out, even partially, that opens up a wide variety of on-the-fly stunts for players. For example, if you read the quick-start rules that (I believe) Keterys posted, "grappling" is now as simple as any other attack check - you just make a Strength Check vs. your opponent's Reflex defense. If you succeed, he's grappled, and certain conditional effects come into play. Bull rush? Strength Check vs. Fortitude. And so on. To address Kamikaze Midget's point above, I imagine a very basic "trip" works the same way. It's just some kind of check vs. Reflex to knock the guy prone...probably without all the benefits in damage and what-not from your per-encounter power...but it's there nonetheless. With rules like that, I doubt we'll see any serious problem of the characters spamming their at-will powers A, B, A, B... ad nauseum, with the occasional encounter or daily thrown in for variety. No. I predict combat will instead be a smorgasbord of delicious variety... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Alright already!!!
Top