Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Am I missing something with Favored Foe?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 8260800" data-attributes="member: 6704184"><p>I will say this, the Ranger Multi-classes better with Tashas. A lot better. </p><p></p><p>Assassin Rogue/Gloomstalker Ranger was already good, now it's very good. Especially with the Poisoner feat.</p><p></p><p>When you get Assassinate, a level 10 (which is admittedly high level for most games, but within the range of most games at least) Assassin5/Gloom5 can stack 3d6 Sneak Attack, 3 attacks (4 if dual wielding), 2d8 poison, 1d4 FF. </p><p></p><p>Let's say this is a non-powergamer type, who uses a shortsword and shield, so it's just 3 attacks with a non optimal weapon. That's 3d6 (10.5) + [1d6+6]x3 (28.5) + 1d4 (2.5) + 2d8 (9) = 50.5 average damage, not counting any additional setup like casting Hunter's Mark instead of using FF, which would bring it up to 58.5 by replacing the 2.5 with 10.5. </p><p></p><p>Actually writing it out, only poisoner is from Tasha's in that in terms of actually improving damage. I'm pretty sure even if we assume a dual weilder hunter's mark will still come out ahead. *</p><p></p><p><em>But</em> Tasha's let's level 1 be useful in all campaigns, and gives a way to just not even choose Hunter's Mark and still be effective in terms of damage. So, I'm cool with that. </p><p></p><p>*Let's do a dual weilder, then Fighting Style changes to TWF. That's 3d6 (10.5) + [1d6+4]x4 (30) + 1d4 (2.5) + 2d8 (9) = 52 (10.5+30+2.5+9), using Favored Foe.</p><p></p><p>Using Hunter's Mark, cast ahead of time, it's; 3d6 (10.5) + [1d6+4]x4 (30) + 3d6 (10.5) + 2d8 (9) = 60 (10.5+30+10.5+9)</p><p></p><p>Hunter's Mark, cast in the first round while maintaining stealth, which for this build should be easy; 3d6 (10.5) + [1d6+4]x4 (30) + 2d6 (7) + 2d8 (9) = 56.5 (10.5+30+7+9)</p><p></p><p>Yeah, Hunter's Mark is more damage in any scenario other than a long fight using the most generous possible reading. Honestly, if you use the most strict reading, I'm not sure FF is even worth dropping more languages and knowing more about certain types of creatures. It's really just the low number of spells known that would make me tempted to take it, and since we use feats I'd probably just take Fey Touched and leave my ranger spells for more interesting things. </p><p></p><p>But with the generous reading, I really might take FF.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 8260800, member: 6704184"] I will say this, the Ranger Multi-classes better with Tashas. A lot better. Assassin Rogue/Gloomstalker Ranger was already good, now it's very good. Especially with the Poisoner feat. When you get Assassinate, a level 10 (which is admittedly high level for most games, but within the range of most games at least) Assassin5/Gloom5 can stack 3d6 Sneak Attack, 3 attacks (4 if dual wielding), 2d8 poison, 1d4 FF. Let's say this is a non-powergamer type, who uses a shortsword and shield, so it's just 3 attacks with a non optimal weapon. That's 3d6 (10.5) + [1d6+6]x3 (28.5) + 1d4 (2.5) + 2d8 (9) = 50.5 average damage, not counting any additional setup like casting Hunter's Mark instead of using FF, which would bring it up to 58.5 by replacing the 2.5 with 10.5. Actually writing it out, only poisoner is from Tasha's in that in terms of actually improving damage. I'm pretty sure even if we assume a dual weilder hunter's mark will still come out ahead. * [I]But[/I] Tasha's let's level 1 be useful in all campaigns, and gives a way to just not even choose Hunter's Mark and still be effective in terms of damage. So, I'm cool with that. *Let's do a dual weilder, then Fighting Style changes to TWF. That's 3d6 (10.5) + [1d6+4]x4 (30) + 1d4 (2.5) + 2d8 (9) = 52 (10.5+30+2.5+9), using Favored Foe. Using Hunter's Mark, cast ahead of time, it's; 3d6 (10.5) + [1d6+4]x4 (30) + 3d6 (10.5) + 2d8 (9) = 60 (10.5+30+10.5+9) Hunter's Mark, cast in the first round while maintaining stealth, which for this build should be easy; 3d6 (10.5) + [1d6+4]x4 (30) + 2d6 (7) + 2d8 (9) = 56.5 (10.5+30+7+9) Yeah, Hunter's Mark is more damage in any scenario other than a long fight using the most generous possible reading. Honestly, if you use the most strict reading, I'm not sure FF is even worth dropping more languages and knowing more about certain types of creatures. It's really just the low number of spells known that would make me tempted to take it, and since we use feats I'd probably just take Fey Touched and leave my ranger spells for more interesting things. But with the generous reading, I really might take FF. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Am I missing something with Favored Foe?
Top