Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
An Examination of Differences between Editions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rothe" data-source="post: 3396812" data-attributes="member: 39813"><p>Reduced quote to save space. I know exactly what you are talking about. In earlier editions this could also become annoying where DMs required you to explain everything in nitty-gritty detail, forget to say we look at the ceiling when we enter the room and you could die. Hence the creation of mutlii-paged "standard-operating-procedures" detailing which character looks where when walking down the hallway, how we check a door or item before actually touching it, etc. As a player having to resort to such was tiring. Especially once you got to some respectable levels. Experienced adventurers don't forget to look at the ceiling or behind things, unless maybe they are INT 4. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />.</p><p></p><p>Then and these days I simply let players know on their first adventure that they are inexpereinced, I'll assume they do very little as standard operating procedure unless told otherwise. Once they get a few forays in I'll assume they are more cautious and will just ask how cautious they wish to be. Caution takes time, so monsters can wander by, spells can run out etc., it's not an easy choice to always be super-cautious. </p><p></p><p>On the old INT 4 character, which frankly I'd strongly discourage for the very reasons you mention, if the player choses INT 4 then they should live with the consequences, just like if they chose STR 4. Conversly, if a player choses INT 18, then I've always given them benefits to reflect this, more clues, far less chance of forgetting standard operating procedures or even suggesting things. There is no lack of player freedom in prohibiting an INT 4 character from thinking of something incredible (of course looking behind a picture is not too incredible) they freely chose to place that score there and should complain about it later. They want all the benefits of their choices but not of the detriments. Yet people will whine, so I haven't had an INT 4 character and wouldn't allow one unless your willing to play as INT 4.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rothe, post: 3396812, member: 39813"] Reduced quote to save space. I know exactly what you are talking about. In earlier editions this could also become annoying where DMs required you to explain everything in nitty-gritty detail, forget to say we look at the ceiling when we enter the room and you could die. Hence the creation of mutlii-paged "standard-operating-procedures" detailing which character looks where when walking down the hallway, how we check a door or item before actually touching it, etc. As a player having to resort to such was tiring. Especially once you got to some respectable levels. Experienced adventurers don't forget to look at the ceiling or behind things, unless maybe they are INT 4. :). Then and these days I simply let players know on their first adventure that they are inexpereinced, I'll assume they do very little as standard operating procedure unless told otherwise. Once they get a few forays in I'll assume they are more cautious and will just ask how cautious they wish to be. Caution takes time, so monsters can wander by, spells can run out etc., it's not an easy choice to always be super-cautious. On the old INT 4 character, which frankly I'd strongly discourage for the very reasons you mention, if the player choses INT 4 then they should live with the consequences, just like if they chose STR 4. Conversly, if a player choses INT 18, then I've always given them benefits to reflect this, more clues, far less chance of forgetting standard operating procedures or even suggesting things. There is no lack of player freedom in prohibiting an INT 4 character from thinking of something incredible (of course looking behind a picture is not too incredible) they freely chose to place that score there and should complain about it later. They want all the benefits of their choices but not of the detriments. Yet people will whine, so I haven't had an INT 4 character and wouldn't allow one unless your willing to play as INT 4. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
An Examination of Differences between Editions
Top