Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Erik Mona" data-source="post: 1542802" data-attributes="member: 2174">Well, insofar as I'm concerned, &quot;Greyhawk&quot; and &quot;core D&amp;D&quot; are pretty much the same thing. If there's no reason _not_ to set an adventure in the core world, I'll put it there. We've got three Eberron adventures in the next five issues, and something really big planned for Eberron next year. There's a Realms adventure in #113 (which we're working on now), and I think it's a really good one. Ed Greenwood was good enough to supply some additional details on the city of Marsember, for which we're grateful. I've got it in mind to do a really special Forgotten Realms &quot;event&quot; next year, but I'm weighing a couple options for what that should be.For the most part, generic D&amp;D and Greyhawk adventures will be the same thing. This is fundamentally no different from how the magazine's been run since the advent of 3rd Edition, but since I'm blessed (cursed?) with an obsession with the campaign setting, I suspect the adventures will &quot;fit&quot; in a little better without becoming so &quot;Greyhawky&quot; that they'll be unusable by the average &quot;home campaign setting&quot; DM (which makes up, I believe, the bulk of our readers).Since people have to convert the proper nouns in a &quot;generic&quot; adventure anyway, we might as well make those proper nouns usable to a large number of our readers.Does that answer the question?--Erik MonaEditor-in-ChiefDungeon Magazine</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Erik Mona, post: 1542802, member: 2174"] Well, insofar as I'm concerned, "Greyhawk" and "core D&D" are pretty much the same thing. If there's no reason _not_ to set an adventure in the core world, I'll put it there. We've got three Eberron adventures in the next five issues, and something really big planned for Eberron next year. There's a Realms adventure in #113 (which we're working on now), and I think it's a really good one. Ed Greenwood was good enough to supply some additional details on the city of Marsember, for which we're grateful. I've got it in mind to do a really special Forgotten Realms "event" next year, but I'm weighing a couple options for what that should be. For the most part, generic D&D and Greyhawk adventures will be the same thing. This is fundamentally no different from how the magazine's been run since the advent of 3rd Edition, but since I'm blessed (cursed?) with an obsession with the campaign setting, I suspect the adventures will "fit" in a little better without becoming so "Greyhawky" that they'll be unusable by the average "home campaign setting" DM (which makes up, I believe, the bulk of our readers). Since people have to convert the proper nouns in a "generic" adventure anyway, we might as well make those proper nouns usable to a large number of our readers. Does that answer the question? --Erik Mona Editor-in-Chief Dungeon Magazine [/QUOTE]

Verification