Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ketjak" data-source="post: 1546320" data-attributes="member: 1083">Thumbs... neutralOn Dragon Pfft. Who cares?I stopped subscribing to Dragon Magazine more than a year ago. The new classes (several per issue), feats, races, and so on ad nauseum - along with stupid Forgotten Realms junk (junk that's not only useless, it's stupid), predictable stories, and six-month-long countdowns to the next big Wizards product - were more than I could tolerate. Sayonara, Dragon, and these changes just underscore my decision.On DungeonI have been happy with Dungeon as it is. Then again, I liked Polyhedron...On PolyhedronI only resubscribed to Dungeon this year after a wonderful customer service experience and because Polyhedron was included. I never use the adventures, rarely read more than the summary, and have not used a Critical Threat. Polyhedron, on the other hand, is read from cover to cover, every word. It's interesting.Dungeon sans Polyhedron will have one issue to impress me. Even then, the moment I detect more suck than good I'm out. Perhaps Wil Wheaton will keep me on board, and the Dungeoncraft articles shifting here might lend a hand in terms of retention. But they better be freakin' gold to the experienced DM, or I go with Polyhedron.On Wil WheatonThe guy was jacked by unfriendly script writers and directors. He's a good man, the best man I've ever gotten to "know" by his web log. It's not the whining self-aggrandizement you find from most other blogs, including/especially those written by people in the game industry. Wil, I hope they publish your best the first time out... otherwise I'll find another way to read your columns without wasting my money on Dungeon.- Ketjak,Breaking his vow never to post again to protest this change to Dungeon.</blockquote>

Verification