But its been almost a year, How long does it take to make the programs.
It is only fair, stoping the pirating can be fixed real easily, just have the name of the buyer watermarked on the PDF and if it is sent to a turrent then finding out who it was that sent it out will be easy and it will discurrage people from sending it to the net for free web sharing.
So why should I keep paying for a subscription for something i am not getting,
As a developer, I have some sympathy for what you're saying here. However, my sympathy is tempered by the fact that the VTT is nearly a year overdue. I hope this doesn't become Wizards' Duke Nukem Forever.It's funny how non-programmers seem to think they know more about programming schedules and development than actual programmers.
Correct. What's more, watermarks can be defeated with no breaking required, just an anonymous, pre-paid credit card and an anonymous, open wifi network. In other words, stopping the pirating can not be fixed real easily.You seem to be unaware of the fact that any form of copy protection, including watermarks, can be broken rather easily by pirates, because they devote a whole lot of time to doing so.
Re: Cynical thoughts/suits
I can understand why people get angry and blame "suits" rather than *people* in instances such as when WotC lays off staff that folks here admire. It's hard to not be cynical in such an environment (when on one hand WotC staffers report that D&D is breaking sales expectations yet on the other WotC has to lay off folks who, presumably, helped make the game successful).
So while there are certainly *people* behind decisions like the OGL/GSL, there are also (the same?) people behind the decision to make the layoffs.
There is also the disconnect that fans have with regard to the secretly-kept numbers (sales figures, revenue expectations, etc.) and sometimes deceptive/insulting (or what is perceived to be deceptive/insulting) market-speak originating from people at WotC which puts up a barrier as well.
Since it's unlikely that fans will ever get transparency in all that they desire to know (or a thorough explaination every time something happens that they don't like), it's understandable that they conclude that since things didn't go the way they wanted (or think they should) that those behind the decisions are idiots, and using the term "suits" to define these people makes it easier because it's not personal.
It's funny how non-programmers seem to think they know more about programming schedules and development than actual programmers.
It's funny how non-programmers seem to think they know more about programming schedules and development than actual programmers.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.