Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nifelhein" data-source="post: 2420504" data-attributes="member: 14129">It seems fine following the standard I have given you, although the introduction to abominations should be made closed content itself, consider any character name to be closed too, so if it happens to be on a spell, specify it too, descriptions being open would be nice, if those you are refering are like the ones we have on the SRD of the MM monsters.Pointing open content during close content passages is not a problem, although you might want to make the same WotC made in the MM, the passages in italics in a monster write up identifies closed content, the remaining (then specify and speak of spell names and the like) are open content. Also, having product identity somewhere in the middle of the open content is not a problem, just remember to reference that, so if a monster name has a place name you want to keep closed, for example, you might say in the introductory chapter of the bestiary that (insert your list) are close content, as well as (place name), (character name that shows up often), Immortal's Handbook, Immortal's Index, Immortal's Bestiary.In general consider that your designation has to clearly be understood by what the americans call &quot;citizen Joe&quot;, the medium person, if you have any atlas games book, open it, they have open content in a different color background, inside boxes, or with a specific symbol (which is not open, by the way) before and after it.All images are product identity, the graphic layout and the like too.And S'mon, I believe that the &quot;there is nothing out of it thing&quot; is the poibnt, they have aimed for just that with this all, WotC has never been nice, they amde a amrket move to seel more of their products, and if you ever do somthing really good, they reprint it, just like they did in Unearthed Arcana with a few mechanics...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nifelhein, post: 2420504, member: 14129"] It seems fine following the standard I have given you, although the introduction to abominations should be made closed content itself, consider any character name to be closed too, so if it happens to be on a spell, specify it too, descriptions being open would be nice, if those you are refering are like the ones we have on the SRD of the MM monsters. Pointing open content during close content passages is not a problem, although you might want to make the same WotC made in the MM, the passages in italics in a monster write up identifies closed content, the remaining (then specify and speak of spell names and the like) are open content. Also, having product identity somewhere in the middle of the open content is not a problem, just remember to reference that, so if a monster name has a place name you want to keep closed, for example, you might say in the introductory chapter of the bestiary that (insert your list) are close content, as well as (place name), (character name that shows up often), Immortal's Handbook, Immortal's Index, Immortal's Bestiary. In general consider that your designation has to clearly be understood by what the americans call "citizen Joe", the medium person, if you have any atlas games book, open it, they have open content in a different color background, inside boxes, or with a specific symbol (which is not open, by the way) before and after it. All images are product identity, the graphic layout and the like too. And S'mon, I believe that the "there is nothing out of it thing" is the poibnt, they have aimed for just that with this all, WotC has never been nice, they amde a amrket move to seel more of their products, and if you ever do somthing really good, they reprint it, just like they did in Unearthed Arcana with a few mechanics... [/QUOTE]

Verification