Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JeffB" data-source="post: 7800354" data-attributes="member: 518">For 4E Edition, I bought and ran quite a few of the Goodman Games adventures. I felt they were all solid, and some were very fun to run. &nbsp;As For WOTC, I found books like Hammerfast, Vor Rukoth, and Open Grave very useful for&nbsp; &quot;adventure starter&quot; material. The initial HPE series had some great ideas and locations, but were ruined by too many combat encounters and linear design.&nbsp; Same for that Dark Sun module- Put on your conductor's cap …..&quot;ALL ABOARD!!!!&quot; Reavers and Winter King (Essentials) were very fun playable adventures. I don't buy that it was a designer issue either. People like Rob Heinsoo, Bruce Cordell, Mearls, etc.&nbsp; have proved themselves very capable of putting out good material. Both before and after 4E. I have to believe that this was some kind of serious management ignorance/stupidity/cluelessness in the first few years of 4E.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="JeffB, post: 7800354, member: 518"] For 4E Edition, I bought and ran quite a few of the Goodman Games adventures. I felt they were all solid, and some were very fun to run. As For WOTC, I found books like Hammerfast, Vor Rukoth, and Open Grave very useful for "adventure starter" material. The initial HPE series had some great ideas and locations, but were ruined by too many combat encounters and linear design. Same for that Dark Sun module- Put on your conductor's cap ….."ALL ABOARD!!!!" Reavers and Winter King (Essentials) were very fun playable adventures. I don't buy that it was a designer issue either. People like Rob Heinsoo, Bruce Cordell, Mearls, etc. have proved themselves very capable of putting out good material. Both before and after 4E. I have to believe that this was some kind of serious management ignorance/stupidity/cluelessness in the first few years of 4E. [/QUOTE]

Verification