Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="rounser" data-source="post: 54123" data-attributes="member: 1106">I was speaking for myself.You're making an assumption that I dislike 3E here.&nbsp; How predictable.There are things wrong with ALL editions of D&amp;D.&nbsp; All of them.&nbsp; Thinking that one edition is good isn't mutually exclusive to thinking the others are too.There are other ways to judge an edition than pure rules mechanics too, as I have to seem to keep on stressing.It's incredibly closeminded, if not downright simpleminded, to classify the entirety of former editions as crappy.&nbsp; Give credit to each edition where it's due - and yes, older editions of D&amp;D do have some strengths that 3E doesn't.&nbsp; This attitude that 3E is better in all ways, shapes and forms and that former editions are crap in all ways, shapes and forms is the kind of black and white thinking associated with 3 year olds.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="rounser, post: 54123, member: 1106"] I was speaking for myself. You're making an assumption that I dislike 3E here. How predictable. There are things wrong with ALL editions of D&D. [b]All of them.[/b] Thinking that one edition is good isn't mutually exclusive to thinking the others are too. There are other ways to judge an edition than pure rules mechanics too, as I have to seem to keep on stressing. It's incredibly closeminded, if not downright simpleminded, to classify the entirety of former editions as crappy. Give credit to each edition where it's due - and yes, older editions of D&D do have some strengths that 3E doesn't. This attitude that 3E is better in all ways, shapes and forms and that former editions are crap in all ways, shapes and forms is the kind of black and white thinking associated with 3 year olds. [/QUOTE]

Verification