Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Arcane Power- Wizards Stretched Thin
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cadfan" data-source="post: 4768919" data-attributes="member: 40961"><p>You are trying to argue that a person who flies in round 1, and then stops, crashes only by means of the application of the fly rules. This happens in round 2, a significant time after the flight ended.</p><p> </p><p>To make this happen, you are applying the fly rules to a creature without flying. You're applying it to a creature that DID have flying, some time ago, but which hasn't got it anymore.</p><p> </p><p>Ok.</p><p> </p><p>Now what if the fly rules that creature operates under grant hover?</p><p> </p><p>Well, at the end of the flight power, we apply the hovering flight rules. It doesn't fall. Next round, we apply the hovering flight rules. It continues not to fall. In fact, at no point will the hovering flight rules cause it to fall.</p><p> </p><p>For your argument to make sense, you have to argue that a non flying creature in mid air who got there due to a power that granted hovering flight which has since expired IS subject to the rules for flying even though it cannot fly anymore since flying is how it got into the air, but IS NOT subject to the rules for hovering flight under precisely the same circumstances.</p><p> </p><p>There is no reason at all to make that distinction.</p><p> </p><p>If you are going to mechanistically apply the flying rules to a formerly flying creature and only cause it to crash when the fly rules say it should crash, then that's what you should do.</p><p> </p><p>In this case the fly rules don't say that the creature crashes, because its governed by the "hovering" flight rules.</p><p> </p><p>I agree that its silly to apply the hovering flight rules to a creature who no longer possesses hovering flight.</p><p> </p><p>But its no less silly than applying the regular flight rules to a creature who no longer possesses regular flight.</p><p> </p><p>If the general principle of "reference the rules for falling that are built into the power that got you into the air" are to be used, then we should actually use them. It just so happens that doing so breaks the game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cadfan, post: 4768919, member: 40961"] You are trying to argue that a person who flies in round 1, and then stops, crashes only by means of the application of the fly rules. This happens in round 2, a significant time after the flight ended. To make this happen, you are applying the fly rules to a creature without flying. You're applying it to a creature that DID have flying, some time ago, but which hasn't got it anymore. Ok. Now what if the fly rules that creature operates under grant hover? Well, at the end of the flight power, we apply the hovering flight rules. It doesn't fall. Next round, we apply the hovering flight rules. It continues not to fall. In fact, at no point will the hovering flight rules cause it to fall. For your argument to make sense, you have to argue that a non flying creature in mid air who got there due to a power that granted hovering flight which has since expired IS subject to the rules for flying even though it cannot fly anymore since flying is how it got into the air, but IS NOT subject to the rules for hovering flight under precisely the same circumstances. There is no reason at all to make that distinction. If you are going to mechanistically apply the flying rules to a formerly flying creature and only cause it to crash when the fly rules say it should crash, then that's what you should do. In this case the fly rules don't say that the creature crashes, because its governed by the "hovering" flight rules. I agree that its silly to apply the hovering flight rules to a creature who no longer possesses hovering flight. But its no less silly than applying the regular flight rules to a creature who no longer possesses regular flight. If the general principle of "reference the rules for falling that are built into the power that got you into the air" are to be used, then we should actually use them. It just so happens that doing so breaks the game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Arcane Power- Wizards Stretched Thin
Top