Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Are easy checks....easy? (4e spoliers)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dasheiff" data-source="post: 4274578" data-attributes="member: 67307"><p>I admit it is a bit convoluted and the more I look at it the more I think I'm wrong. The way it's written though makes what you guys say right, skill challenges aren't really doable at all.</p><p></p><p>Okay, on page 72-73 DMG Step 2 of Skill Challenges it tells you to use the chart on page 42 for the DC. </p><p></p><p>Now the example on page 42 uses a single skill check so it gets a +5, however, this is for a skill challenge so you wouldn't at the +5. Sadly, it does say that the skill challenge uses skill check, which would mean the +5 does go in there.</p><p></p><p>Sadly, this means that for each moderate DC (at 1st level) in a Skill Challenge is 20. Since each player has to make rolls the best we can hope for is that one player has a skill at +15 (the best) two players have a +10 (trained in the correct stat) and the other two at +0 (not trained and in a weak stat). Meaning that by on average for a 10/5 (full encounter challenge) if they each go twice they will have on average 5.5 successes and 8.5 failures. Meaning that when getting to 10 successes they will get about 15.45 failures, making it nearly impossible to ever complete a skill challenge. However, if we assume the moderate DC is 15 with the same characters. We get an average of 7 successes and 3 failures in 2 full rounds which means that on average they'll get 10 Successes around the same time as 4.3 Failures which actually makes it winable more often than not. </p><p></p><p>Remember, encounters are ment to be winable, while the books seems to suggest rules that make that impossible it can't be the correct reading of the rules.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dasheiff, post: 4274578, member: 67307"] I admit it is a bit convoluted and the more I look at it the more I think I'm wrong. The way it's written though makes what you guys say right, skill challenges aren't really doable at all. Okay, on page 72-73 DMG Step 2 of Skill Challenges it tells you to use the chart on page 42 for the DC. Now the example on page 42 uses a single skill check so it gets a +5, however, this is for a skill challenge so you wouldn't at the +5. Sadly, it does say that the skill challenge uses skill check, which would mean the +5 does go in there. Sadly, this means that for each moderate DC (at 1st level) in a Skill Challenge is 20. Since each player has to make rolls the best we can hope for is that one player has a skill at +15 (the best) two players have a +10 (trained in the correct stat) and the other two at +0 (not trained and in a weak stat). Meaning that by on average for a 10/5 (full encounter challenge) if they each go twice they will have on average 5.5 successes and 8.5 failures. Meaning that when getting to 10 successes they will get about 15.45 failures, making it nearly impossible to ever complete a skill challenge. However, if we assume the moderate DC is 15 with the same characters. We get an average of 7 successes and 3 failures in 2 full rounds which means that on average they'll get 10 Successes around the same time as 4.3 Failures which actually makes it winable more often than not. Remember, encounters are ment to be winable, while the books seems to suggest rules that make that impossible it can't be the correct reading of the rules. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Are easy checks....easy? (4e spoliers)
Top