Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Are single class martials still going to be viable in 2024?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 9436488" data-attributes="member: 7030563"><p>I don't think it is close to optimal even on a single class build and the numbers above are not correct.</p><p></p><p>My understanding is you do not get a GWM damage bonus on either your bonus action attack or your reaction attack. What I have read of the GWM feat is that it only applies to the attacks that occur using the attack action. So the PAM bonus action on PAM-GWM is 2.5+4, not 2.5+4+3 and you also do not get GWM on your reaction attack or your hew attack.</p><p></p><p>This is a big reason GWM-PAM is outclassed in general by other styles IMO, not just in this example. IF you got GWM with all your attacks it would be way different.</p><p></p><p>RAW I think the highest damage in a single class before level 11 RAW is going to involve a lot of weapon switching, dropping and drawing different weapons with the Dual wielding feat. I think it is going to be something like: Attack with Greataxe-Cleave-Drop great axe-draw scimitar-draw and attack with shortsword (vex), Nick with scimitar (nick)- drop both weapons-Dual Wielding bonus action draw and attack with a Versatile Longsword or Warhammer.</p><p></p><p>This crazyness aside, I think just basic light weapons with nick and the dual wielder feat is going to beat GWM-PAM by quite a bit.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Then use the exact same feats GWM-PAM. You are just only using the PAM for the reaction since martial arts does more damage than the PAM bonus action attack.</p><p></p><p>Switching from a 2d6 to a d10 weapon drops damage by 3DPR drop in damage from level 6 to level 7 to get the reaction attack, it also drops damage on your Hew attack when you get it.</p><p></p><p>Maybe that is worth it, maybe not but this makes it an easy comparison - same weapon, same strength, same opportunities and number of attacks and slightly more damage</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>They both can get Sentinel, and the multiclass is still doing more damage with their bonus action.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What I used in the earlier post was GWM only with a better weapon meaning more damage. I think in general PAM-GWM with a d10 weapon is going to be substantially worse than GWM with a 2d6 weapon and martial arts and I can show clearly that the latter is doing more damage on your turn (over 4 more DPR) with or without sentinel.</p><p></p><p>But whether it is outright better relies heavily on the value and frequency of your PAM reaction attacks as compared to that extra damage you do on your turn and the frequency of Sentinel attacks. More Sentinel attacks or fewer reactions overall would favor not using a pole arm (even if with the feat)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 9436488, member: 7030563"] I don't think it is close to optimal even on a single class build and the numbers above are not correct. My understanding is you do not get a GWM damage bonus on either your bonus action attack or your reaction attack. What I have read of the GWM feat is that it only applies to the attacks that occur using the attack action. So the PAM bonus action on PAM-GWM is 2.5+4, not 2.5+4+3 and you also do not get GWM on your reaction attack or your hew attack. This is a big reason GWM-PAM is outclassed in general by other styles IMO, not just in this example. IF you got GWM with all your attacks it would be way different. RAW I think the highest damage in a single class before level 11 RAW is going to involve a lot of weapon switching, dropping and drawing different weapons with the Dual wielding feat. I think it is going to be something like: Attack with Greataxe-Cleave-Drop great axe-draw scimitar-draw and attack with shortsword (vex), Nick with scimitar (nick)- drop both weapons-Dual Wielding bonus action draw and attack with a Versatile Longsword or Warhammer. This crazyness aside, I think just basic light weapons with nick and the dual wielder feat is going to beat GWM-PAM by quite a bit. Then use the exact same feats GWM-PAM. You are just only using the PAM for the reaction since martial arts does more damage than the PAM bonus action attack. Switching from a 2d6 to a d10 weapon drops damage by 3DPR drop in damage from level 6 to level 7 to get the reaction attack, it also drops damage on your Hew attack when you get it. Maybe that is worth it, maybe not but this makes it an easy comparison - same weapon, same strength, same opportunities and number of attacks and slightly more damage They both can get Sentinel, and the multiclass is still doing more damage with their bonus action. What I used in the earlier post was GWM only with a better weapon meaning more damage. I think in general PAM-GWM with a d10 weapon is going to be substantially worse than GWM with a 2d6 weapon and martial arts and I can show clearly that the latter is doing more damage on your turn (over 4 more DPR) with or without sentinel. But whether it is outright better relies heavily on the value and frequency of your PAM reaction attacks as compared to that extra damage you do on your turn and the frequency of Sentinel attacks. More Sentinel attacks or fewer reactions overall would favor not using a pole arm (even if with the feat) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Are single class martials still going to be viable in 2024?
Top