pawsplay
Hero
In any case, female body parts have as much justification as a tiger head or inverted heads for being on a rakshasa.
All I'm saying is that if something is a natural species, I expect a reasonable explanation for its appearance and habits, and if it's weird or supernatural or whatever, I expect things to make thematic sense. Dragonborn are A) draconic and B) not related to humans or similar races, so I don't get where the you-know-whats entered into things. I would expect, maybe, to see some human-like proportions on a 3.5 type dragonborn, and I could see similar traits in something like a yuan-ti, but when it comes to dragonborn, lizark folk, troglodytes, and the like, I don't expect them to be so, you know, mammalian.
I mean, has anyone ever seriously concerned themselves with whether a picture of a given troglodyte was male or female?
All I'm saying is that if something is a natural species, I expect a reasonable explanation for its appearance and habits, and if it's weird or supernatural or whatever, I expect things to make thematic sense. Dragonborn are A) draconic and B) not related to humans or similar races, so I don't get where the you-know-whats entered into things. I would expect, maybe, to see some human-like proportions on a 3.5 type dragonborn, and I could see similar traits in something like a yuan-ti, but when it comes to dragonborn, lizark folk, troglodytes, and the like, I don't expect them to be so, you know, mammalian.
I mean, has anyone ever seriously concerned themselves with whether a picture of a given troglodyte was male or female?