Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Asians Represent: "Has WotC Fixed the D&D Monk?"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="overgeeked" data-source="post: 9066603" data-attributes="member: 86653"><p>No, none of that. I read popular fiction, watch popular movies and TV series, I play popular games, and I love some popular stuff. It's not ivory tower snobbery.</p><p></p><p>One example: power creep. Making newer stuff more powerful than older stuff. Why do that? Because it sells books. It's bad design because it makes the game unbalanced, players stop using the older stuff, and pushes players to newer stuff...but it sells books. Good design would be to meticulously balance the game, bad design would be to progressively unbalance the game to sell new books with busted PC options. Have a look at the PC options in Xanathar's compared to the base options in the PHB. Then compare the options in Tasha's to Xanathar's. Neon-sign glaringly obvious power creep. It's a common tactic and has been going on in the RPG industry for...ever really. The first supplement for OD&D introduced paladins, thieves, and STR giving fighters to-hit and damage bonuses. Splat churn. Power creep. Etc. It's one example. There's more.</p><p></p><p>There's another great example: D&D 4E. It was a wonderfully balanced game, meticulously designed (after a few early hiccups), but it didn't sell well enough to meet expectations. It sold better than every other RPG on the market (with the possible exception of Pathfinder for a few months...maybe), but it was scrapped because it didn't sell enough for WotC. Great design + bad sales = scrapped game. Sales matter more than design. WotC is in the sales business. Good game design is secondary.</p><p></p><p>It's also common in MMOs. WoW does this constantly. They intentionally bust classes and specs each expansion, introduce new races and sometimes new classes that are busted all in the hopes of players spending more money. As the expansion progresses, they tweak the new stuff (i.e. generally nerf it into the ground), while also busting other races, classes, and specs, pushing players to other options and spending more money. It's just how WoW works.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="overgeeked, post: 9066603, member: 86653"] No, none of that. I read popular fiction, watch popular movies and TV series, I play popular games, and I love some popular stuff. It's not ivory tower snobbery. One example: power creep. Making newer stuff more powerful than older stuff. Why do that? Because it sells books. It's bad design because it makes the game unbalanced, players stop using the older stuff, and pushes players to newer stuff...but it sells books. Good design would be to meticulously balance the game, bad design would be to progressively unbalance the game to sell new books with busted PC options. Have a look at the PC options in Xanathar's compared to the base options in the PHB. Then compare the options in Tasha's to Xanathar's. Neon-sign glaringly obvious power creep. It's a common tactic and has been going on in the RPG industry for...ever really. The first supplement for OD&D introduced paladins, thieves, and STR giving fighters to-hit and damage bonuses. Splat churn. Power creep. Etc. It's one example. There's more. There's another great example: D&D 4E. It was a wonderfully balanced game, meticulously designed (after a few early hiccups), but it didn't sell well enough to meet expectations. It sold better than every other RPG on the market (with the possible exception of Pathfinder for a few months...maybe), but it was scrapped because it didn't sell enough for WotC. Great design + bad sales = scrapped game. Sales matter more than design. WotC is in the sales business. Good game design is secondary. It's also common in MMOs. WoW does this constantly. They intentionally bust classes and specs each expansion, introduce new races and sometimes new classes that are busted all in the hopes of players spending more money. As the expansion progresses, they tweak the new stuff (i.e. generally nerf it into the ground), while also busting other races, classes, and specs, pushing players to other options and spending more money. It's just how WoW works. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Asians Represent: "Has WotC Fixed the D&D Monk?"
Top