Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Attack Cantrips
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kobold Stew" data-source="post: 6142172" data-attributes="member: 23484"><p>Changes have been made to both <em>Ray of Frost</em> and <em>Lance of Faith</em>, which is now <em>Sacred Flame</em>.</p><p></p><p><strong>Ray of Frost</strong>.</p><p>* it's now an attack spell, a magical attack (and no longer something saved against)</p><p>* range is halved to 50' from 100'.</p><p></p><p><strong>Sacred Flame</strong>.</p><p>* is mechanically identical to <em>Lance of Faith</em>, except for range.</p><p>* range is halved to 25' from 50'.</p><p>* flavour text goes crazy cancels the concept of a laser cleric.</p><p></p><p>Thoughts:</p><p>1. The change of <em>Ray of Frost</em> to an attack spell is right (as has been discussed <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?335707-As-passive-as-a-laser-cleric" target="_blank">on these boards</a>). </p><p>2. I'd prefer it to be a ranged attack than a magical attack (using dexterity), so that the choice for a wizard (or sorcerer) to be a ray specialist; not for every wizard to be equally capable. Using a second stat encourages some system specialization, some balance and design choice.</p><p>3. <em>Sacred Flame</em> is still passive (a spell defended against rather than an attack). </p><p>4. Flames descending from above?! what's up with this? Where do they begin? What's wrong with the notion of a laser cleric?</p><p>5. The reduced range is not a big penalty for the Lightbringer cleric, at least: Disciple of the Sun lets a cleric cast <em>Sacred Flame</em> as a reaction against melee attacks. Still: as a reaction, the unarmoured cleric drops flames on her opponent's head. </p><p>6. The only "benefit" I see is that it removes one of the two uses of the holy symbol. (That was just in the flavour text, too, but it was at least there. Now there's no reason to have a holy symbol as a cleric until you are casting a seventh-level spell (Destruction). But it's still there in every equipment package. </p><p>7. Why are these spells not parallel? Why is the Wizard's cantrip so much better than the Cleric's? Why do the designers want to keep clerics passive?</p><p></p><p>* The change to <em>Ray of Frost</em> is a step forward: it's better now, and the 50' range is reasonable.</p><p>* The change to<em> Lance of Faith</em> (into <em>Sacred Flame</em>) is actively regressive, entrenching the problems with the spell previously, and cutting the range significantly.</p><p>* I really think both spells should be parallel, ranged attack spells (50'?)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kobold Stew, post: 6142172, member: 23484"] Changes have been made to both [I]Ray of Frost[/I] and [I]Lance of Faith[/I], which is now [I]Sacred Flame[/I]. [B]Ray of Frost[/B]. * it's now an attack spell, a magical attack (and no longer something saved against) * range is halved to 50' from 100'. [B]Sacred Flame[/B]. * is mechanically identical to [I]Lance of Faith[/I], except for range. * range is halved to 25' from 50'. * flavour text goes crazy cancels the concept of a laser cleric. Thoughts: 1. The change of [I]Ray of Frost[/I] to an attack spell is right (as has been discussed [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?335707-As-passive-as-a-laser-cleric"]on these boards[/URL]). 2. I'd prefer it to be a ranged attack than a magical attack (using dexterity), so that the choice for a wizard (or sorcerer) to be a ray specialist; not for every wizard to be equally capable. Using a second stat encourages some system specialization, some balance and design choice. 3. [I]Sacred Flame[/I] is still passive (a spell defended against rather than an attack). 4. Flames descending from above?! what's up with this? Where do they begin? What's wrong with the notion of a laser cleric? 5. The reduced range is not a big penalty for the Lightbringer cleric, at least: Disciple of the Sun lets a cleric cast [I]Sacred Flame[/I] as a reaction against melee attacks. Still: as a reaction, the unarmoured cleric drops flames on her opponent's head. 6. The only "benefit" I see is that it removes one of the two uses of the holy symbol. (That was just in the flavour text, too, but it was at least there. Now there's no reason to have a holy symbol as a cleric until you are casting a seventh-level spell (Destruction). But it's still there in every equipment package. 7. Why are these spells not parallel? Why is the Wizard's cantrip so much better than the Cleric's? Why do the designers want to keep clerics passive? * The change to [I]Ray of Frost[/I] is a step forward: it's better now, and the 50' range is reasonable. * The change to[I] Lance of Faith[/I] (into [I]Sacred Flame[/I]) is actively regressive, entrenching the problems with the spell previously, and cutting the range significantly. * I really think both spells should be parallel, ranged attack spells (50'?) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Attack Cantrips
Top