Augment Healing & Mass Lesser Vigor

[Ogrork the Mighty]

See the thread linked below:

http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=222079

Would you allow the Augment Healing feat to apply to Mass Lesser Vigor (or any of the Vigor spells, really)?

 

[moritheil]

You're aware that most of the argument right now hinges on small details that even those arguing agree do not necessarily affect a ruling?

That is, whether or not lesser vigor, which grants fast healing 1, heals you directly or indirectly is moot if you rule that all conjuration (healing) spells benefit.

It is only if you rule that only spells that heal to begin with benefit that the direct/indirect healing issue matters.

 

[Ogrork the Mighty]

To be honest, I don't really care about what the argument's become. Now it's pretty much two people slogging it out in a grudgefest.

Someone in that thread suggested a poll. Here it is.

I think the average DM has more than enough information to make a decision at this point.

 

[Nifft]

My RAW answer is different from my IMC answer.

This is a very ambiguous question, and either needs more options or should be in a different forum.

Can't vote, -- N

 

[moritheil]

My RAW answer is different from my IMC answer.

This is a very ambiguous question, and either needs more options or should be in a different forum.

Can't vote, -- N

Agreed. The point of this forum is not just to establish what goes on in a campaign but what the RAW actually says.

To be honest, I don't really care about what the argument's become. Now it's pretty much two people slogging it out in a grudgefest.

I don't really think so - page 2 is mostly taken up by 3 people, but the discussion before and after that involves many people. And if there really is a legitimate issue it doesn't matter what form the discussion takes, the issue is still a valid concern. Interest or lack thereof has no bearing on legitimacy.

 

[blargney the second]

Agreed. The point of this forum is not just to establish what goes on in a campaign but what the RAW actually says.

Huh, that's funny. I take everything said in this forum as a potentially interesting and useful interpretation, and don't give a fuzz about hardline RAW.

 

[Ogrork the Mighty]

I don't really think so - page 2 is mostly taken up by 3 people, but the discussion before and after that involves many people. And if there really is a legitimate issue it doesn't matter what form the discussion takes, the issue is still a valid concern. Interest or lack thereof has no bearing on legitimacy.

Me thinks you protest too much.

Chill out.