Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Treebore" data-source="post: 1911896" data-attributes="member: 10177">I like playing Druids, I know how wicked they can be, as a summoner and as a shapeshifter, but as a DM I would say that a spellcasting squirrel/monkey/pick animal is casting a spell it would be detected by a Spot check and then a spellcraft check as per the rules. As someone said earlier, no matter what form my Druid is casting a spell is not "natural behavior", so should stand out and be recognizeable to someone who knows what to look for.As for the earlier response to my accusing WOTC being bad at balancing feats, I will keep my opinion. What would have been so bad to have made the feat a two stage stackable feat instead of requiring a Druid to have a useless spell focus feat for Conjuration? Granted the end result is still the same, two used feats, but at least none of them would be a "throw away" feat for the purpose of game balance. Ultimately only a difference in somantics, unless of course you only take one of the two feats. If WOTC figured a feat giving a +1 BAB and +1 per HD of a creature is unbalancing, well, I would be in total disagreement. To require a Druid to throw away one of the few feats they get is rediculous.</blockquote>