Bad news for Duncan Idaho

I have never understood the value of clones except in very particular (probably unethical) medical circumstances. otherwise, if you can clone, you can just fertilize eggs.
I remember when Dolly the sheep first happened, there was a editorial cartoon in the local paper. In it, an excited scientist is holding a newspaper with the headline and loudly exclaiming "now we can reproduce without having sex!" The tagline was "another solution in search of a problem."
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad





What does it even mean for a clone to have three times as many mutations as an offspring that is only half of the original?

Anyway what it sounds like is that we need a new study to determine whether you can intersperse cloning and natural reproduction indefinitely while maintaining stability.
 

The real important aspect of this finding is the strong suggestion that sexual reproduction manages to fix errors in transcription that cloning does not catch. I wonder if this is simply because there is, well, less transcription.
 

The real important aspect of this finding is the strong suggestion that sexual reproduction manages to fix errors in transcription that cloning does not catch. I wonder if this is simply because there is, well, less transcription.
It's probably because sexual reproduction produces the errors anyway, and those errors are called evil by the parents/community, who then float those errors down the river so the gods can decide what to do with them.

Dog breeding is quite a bit older than cloning, and has already resulted in the perfect organism:
Dog Teeth GIF
 


Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Top