Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ban Variant-Human! Impact?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Esker" data-source="post: 7836171" data-attributes="member: 6966824"><p>Negate it? There are ways to mitigate it, but you never negate it. If you have advantage, it means that you're starting at a higher baseline.</p><p></p><p>Take a reckless attacking barbarian at level 2, 16 STR, using a greatsword, and figure a nat 9 or better needed to hit.</p><p></p><p>Without -5/+10, we have 0.84 * (7 + 3) = 8.4 DPR</p><p>With -5/+10, we have 0.5775 * (7 + 13) = 11.55 DPR</p><p></p><p>Reckless attack is one of the most reliable ways to mitigate the -5, and there, the -5/+10 is netting a 37.5% increase in DPR. It's good, yes! But double or triple? Where are you getting that? I guess maybe the idea is that at low levels you are also more likely to drop a creature with that damage and therefore get a bonus action attack out of it? </p><p></p><p>As for SS, the obvious candidate is a fighter with archery style. </p><p></p><p>Without -5/+10 we have 0.70 * (4.5 + 3) = 5.25</p><p>With -5/+10 we have 0.45 * (4.5 + 13) = 7.875</p><p></p><p>which is a 50% increase in damage. I'll take it, sure! But it's not double or triple (and even with the feat you're doing less damage than a melee barbarian without it; just at range). And yes, sometimes cover would have come into play, and if you're dealing with 3/4 cover the -5 is completely negated (well, more accurately, both characters are paying it) and you're getting a "free" +10. But that's not all that common a situation IME.</p><p></p><p>Compared to getting a free bonus action attack with ability mod, without having to commit to TWF style, neither -5/+10 feat is as good.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I understand what the feats are for, and I recognize that they're good feats, but why are they particularly problematic at low levels? Sorcerers have Resilient CON automatically. Does that make them OP at low levels? War Caster is better than Resilient in Tier 1, but... at low levels you have relatively few spell slots, so you're not likely to be concentrating as often as you are later on. Is it because the DC is so unlikely to be more than 10 at those levels?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, it's a lot of healing, and for a very cheap resource. That wasn't one of the ones I questioned, btw, because it's clear why its effect is magnified at low levels (like HAM and Inspiring Leader). But full action healing is overrated, simply because of the action economy opportunity cost. A thief with the Healer feat can use it as a bonus action, making it better, but not until level 3. It's a good feat, but it doesn't break anything; especially since you can only use it once per character per rest.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Esker, post: 7836171, member: 6966824"] Negate it? There are ways to mitigate it, but you never negate it. If you have advantage, it means that you're starting at a higher baseline. Take a reckless attacking barbarian at level 2, 16 STR, using a greatsword, and figure a nat 9 or better needed to hit. Without -5/+10, we have 0.84 * (7 + 3) = 8.4 DPR With -5/+10, we have 0.5775 * (7 + 13) = 11.55 DPR Reckless attack is one of the most reliable ways to mitigate the -5, and there, the -5/+10 is netting a 37.5% increase in DPR. It's good, yes! But double or triple? Where are you getting that? I guess maybe the idea is that at low levels you are also more likely to drop a creature with that damage and therefore get a bonus action attack out of it? As for SS, the obvious candidate is a fighter with archery style. Without -5/+10 we have 0.70 * (4.5 + 3) = 5.25 With -5/+10 we have 0.45 * (4.5 + 13) = 7.875 which is a 50% increase in damage. I'll take it, sure! But it's not double or triple (and even with the feat you're doing less damage than a melee barbarian without it; just at range). And yes, sometimes cover would have come into play, and if you're dealing with 3/4 cover the -5 is completely negated (well, more accurately, both characters are paying it) and you're getting a "free" +10. But that's not all that common a situation IME. Compared to getting a free bonus action attack with ability mod, without having to commit to TWF style, neither -5/+10 feat is as good. I understand what the feats are for, and I recognize that they're good feats, but why are they particularly problematic at low levels? Sorcerers have Resilient CON automatically. Does that make them OP at low levels? War Caster is better than Resilient in Tier 1, but... at low levels you have relatively few spell slots, so you're not likely to be concentrating as often as you are later on. Is it because the DC is so unlikely to be more than 10 at those levels? Yeah, it's a lot of healing, and for a very cheap resource. That wasn't one of the ones I questioned, btw, because it's clear why its effect is magnified at low levels (like HAM and Inspiring Leader). But full action healing is overrated, simply because of the action economy opportunity cost. A thief with the Healer feat can use it as a bonus action, making it better, but not until level 3. It's a good feat, but it doesn't break anything; especially since you can only use it once per character per rest. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ban Variant-Human! Impact?
Top