Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Nyaricus" data-source="post: 2845509" data-attributes="member: 35678">So is your post, if you're just going to threadcrap :\<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused    :confused:"  data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> Say what? The barbarian class is based off of two things: Nordic people and Nordic Berserkers. I could go into great detail right now, but I have to sleep sometime. Point being, your point is valid that this class varient is overpowered and there's no need to apollogise for that. "Flavour wise" D&D is a big old hodgepodge of stuff, with the Barbarian Class (that's the base class, page 24 of the Players Handbook) IS a berserker, so I have no idea what you talking about. Maybe you owe someone an apollogy?So what? The bard is a mook of all trades, why not have a specific, niche base class. Like a Paladin, or a Dragon Shaman? Or one of the hundred of thousands of other classes.[rant]Every time I see a post on HOUSE RULES saying "there's no need for X, because blah" I cringe, and a post baby dies. People, lets be straight here. New creation are the purpose of this forum. It wouldn't be here otherwise. Frankly, it's pretty popular all-in-all, with my experience on the boards the last 10 months that we've had an average of 7 pages of threads from a month ago on average. Thats a lot of work there. There's no need to be cruel because YOUR perception of the game and what it should be is different. Base your criticisms on the work itself, and not it's niche. I am even guilty of not going into threads that don't really interest me, even though I might be able to help. More people should just *randomly* browse HRs and just check out the need crunk people make in here - there are tons of great examples I can't even get into. Anyways, just base your critiques on a persons' works' merit - not the person.[/rant]Already proven that they are, in regards to feats. Frankly, FM is better, so I don't get what your bellyaching is about.You are just a poster who is borderline trolling and asking for a report!Some people "get" balance, or need a lot of help form the community to reach that point with their projects, so don't don't base a persons min-maxing tendancies on their posts.</blockquote>

Verification