Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="glass" data-source="post: 8754422" data-attributes="member: 12251">I do not know who wrote that sidebar, but I can only assume they had not read the rest of the book when they did so. Even aside from the &quot;new edition&quot; question, it severely understates the extent and scope of the &quot;revisions&quot;. And even if that was not the case, actions speak louder than words. WotC certainly treated it as a new edition, releasing a new line of splat books that covered the same ground as the 3.0 versions.Not &quot;alternatively&quot;, fictionally.Of course it does. Projection and muddying the waters are standard practice for edition warriors. Does not mean that all such accusations have equal (or any) foundation. And it is hilarious that you are trying to pull this on on me, when most of my gaming over the last 22 years and now is the 3e family rather than 4e (albeit generally PF1 these days). I spend more time defending 4e from misinformation, not because it is my particular favourite, but because it needs it more.&nbsp;Essentials. Was. Not. A. Change.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="glass, post: 8754422, member: 12251"] I do not know who wrote that sidebar, but I can only assume they had not read the rest of the book when they did so. Even aside from the "new edition" question, it severely understates the extent and scope of the "revisions". And even if that was not the case, actions speak louder than words. WotC certainly treated it as a new edition, releasing a new line of splat books that covered the same ground as the 3.0 versions. Not "alternatively", fictionally. Of course it does. Projection and muddying the waters are standard practice for edition warriors. Does not mean that all such accusations have equal (or any) foundation. And it is hilarious that you are trying to pull this on on me, when most of my gaming over the last 22 years and now is the 3e family rather than 4e (albeit generally PF1 these days). I spend more time defending 4e from misinformation, not because it is my particular favourite, but because [I]it needs it more[/I]. Essentials. Was. Not. A. Change. [/QUOTE]

Verification