Batgirl movie cancelled


log in or register to remove this ad

billd91

Not your screen monkey (he/him)
There's some very strange rules in the US tax system, if that's the case. I'm sure the intention was not to incentivise NOT releasing films.

Still, Hollywood seems to live in a world of its own when it comes to accounting, since none of the films ever make a profit (hence big stars insisting on a share of the gross, rather than the net). Anywhere else that would be false accounting and/or fraud. So I guess nothing should surprise me.
I don't think it's just Hollywood here. I think, in this case, it's a way for companies that go through structural changes - mergers, acquisitions - to obtain some tax benefit from stopping incomplete projects previously initiated by one of the partners in the merger or the acquired company. I can see some practical benefit of taking such a step, but, yeah, that kind of tax rule indicates how preferential the tax code can be toward corporations and their interests and methods. But I suspect that it's not just the US tax system that offers similar benefits considering how pro-corporation plenty of other governments are.
 

Mallus

Legend
I wasn't interested until I read about the cancellation and found out the directors worked on Ms. Marvel. Now I'm disappointed! Ms. Marvel had the kind of visual style/distinctiveness the Disney/Marvel needs a lot more of.

I'm also kinda worried because HBOMax is a great service with a broad library of TV & film, original and archival. I'd rather it not be slashed to bits by corporate cost-cutting.
 

Hex08

Hero
While
By whose standards though? Some random critics and movie goers? I never pay attention to what these people say. I just think Waner/DC are just mis-managed.
If the poor reviews are truly part of the reason, and considering the company's silence on this we will never know, test screenings are common to gauge audience reactions and will frequently prompt reshoots/rewrites and further test screenings. This means, for better or for worse, everyone who sees a movie is impacted by those reviews.

I think your point about DC properties being mismanaged is spot on. Warner Bros bought DC in 1969 and other than Batman and Superman they never had a successful superhero movie and rarely tried to get other properties to the big screen. Marvel, on the other hand, got the MCU started before it was bought out by Disney. Warner should have started the superhero movie craze and failed miserably, after all DC was owned by a media giant long before Marvel. As Warner has changed hands these past few years; from being bought out by AT&T and then the Discovery merger nothing has improved (although AT&T at least seemed to have a plan). Now it looks like HBO Max may leave behind scripted TV altogether.

I would have watched Batgirl because I love superheroes but I wasn't excited about it. Instead, we are getting a Flash movie headlined by the train wreck that is Ezra Miller (I kind of feel bad for this actor, they have serious issues that need worked on) and a Black Adam movie headlined by Dwayne Johnson who thinks bicep size equals acting talent. Considering what's coming down the line I would much rather have watched Batgirl than either Flash or Black Adam.
 
Last edited:

money talks. if they thought the movie stunk but would make money they would release it . its not the only rumored show that might get cut (last of us and a few others).

They dont want to do what netflix did and greenlight a bunch of stuff and then lose money. That got Netflix in a lot of financial trouble

the reviews good or bad are irrelevant when you are talking that kind of money.

i think its a brilliant move
 

R_J_K75

Legend
Considering what's coming down the line I would much rather have watched Batgirl than either Flash or Black Adam.
That was a great summation. I didnt realize that Warner had the rights for so long. DC v. Marvel, I couldnt pick. But yeah, I'd at least be a VOD purchaser for Batgirl.
 


FitzTheRuke

Legend
I suspect that the movie is not particularly good, but not so bad it should be cancelled. I just think that they had their accountants do the math, and found that they'd save more money by cancelling it than they'd make by releasing it (based on expectations, which could be better, or could be worse and nobody really knows). The tax break was a sure thing.
 

Hex08

Hero
money talks. if they thought the movie stunk but would make money they would release it . its not the only rumored show that might get cut (last of us and a few others).

They dont want to do what netflix did and greenlight a bunch of stuff and then lose money. That got Netflix in a lot of financial trouble

the reviews good or bad are irrelevant when you are talking that kind of money.

i think its a brilliant move
I have to disagree. Crappy movies get released all of the time and the studios can't be blind to how bad they are and that they won't make a profit. From what I've been reading Batgirl has the largest or one of the largest financial investments (90 million dollars or more) to not be released, it seems unprecedented. Couple that with the bad press around Ezra Miller and I doubt it's a profit motive decision because as it stands Flash probably won't put up the numbers it might have a few years ago.
 


Remove ads

Top