Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Battlerager: Experiences?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mal Malenkirk" data-source="post: 4636020" data-attributes="member: 834"><p>Don't like the Battlerager; there's the barbarian.</p><p></p><p>Don't like the Tempest fighter; there's the Ranger.</p><p></p><p>These fighter build step on toes and do it with suspicious mechanics (though I have much more sympathy for the Tempest fighter as long as you remove the absurd off-hand property on the double-weapons).</p><p></p><p>The battlerager is particularly weird in term of fluff/mechanics. What's battleragey about the fighter/battlerager? Aside from his class features, he still gains the same powers as other fighters. He mostly stands his ground and act like any other defender but for some mysterious reasons gains tons of THP at the expense of +1 to hit because he has a temper that doesn't translate to his tactics.</p><p></p><p>Now <em>this</em> is a dwarven battlerager, both in fluff and in mechanics.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://dc105.4shared.com/img/81632297/53ba39b6/dwarf.jpg?sizeM=3" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></p><p></p><p>We already have the CON based barbarian who regains THP in a much better balanced way and has powers that actually scream 'Battlerager'.</p><p></p><p>The fighter/battlerager is to be tossed aside in favor of the barbarian IMO. I don't even feel bad about killing character concepts because I don't. I just kill a broken feature.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mal Malenkirk, post: 4636020, member: 834"] Don't like the Battlerager; there's the barbarian. Don't like the Tempest fighter; there's the Ranger. These fighter build step on toes and do it with suspicious mechanics (though I have much more sympathy for the Tempest fighter as long as you remove the absurd off-hand property on the double-weapons). The battlerager is particularly weird in term of fluff/mechanics. What's battleragey about the fighter/battlerager? Aside from his class features, he still gains the same powers as other fighters. He mostly stands his ground and act like any other defender but for some mysterious reasons gains tons of THP at the expense of +1 to hit because he has a temper that doesn't translate to his tactics. Now [I]this[/I] is a dwarven battlerager, both in fluff and in mechanics. [IMG]http://dc105.4shared.com/img/81632297/53ba39b6/dwarf.jpg?sizeM=3[/IMG] We already have the CON based barbarian who regains THP in a much better balanced way and has powers that actually scream 'Battlerager'. The fighter/battlerager is to be tossed aside in favor of the barbarian IMO. I don't even feel bad about killing character concepts because I don't. I just kill a broken feature. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Battlerager: Experiences?
Top