D&D General Beadle & Grimms Forgotten Realms Premium Map Collection

I don't think it isnoverthinking it to point out that WotC simply has a "no real world religion, period" policy that theybhave consistently applied for years.
Reading the thread, it seems more like people are guessing they have this as a policy. I haven't seen a statement from WotC on the matter. And the presence of Asmodeus and Hades and Hell and many other things in the DMG seem to discredit this "no real world religion, period" notion lol. A cult of Orcus is features in Dragon Delves, for crying out loud. Not to mention the omnipresence of Tiamat this edition.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Reading the thread, it seems more like people are guessing they have this as a policy. I haven't seen a statement from WotC on the matter. And the presence of Asmodeus and Hades and Hell and many other things in the DMG seem to discredit this "no real world religion, period" notion lol. A cult of Orcus is features in Dragon Delves, for crying out loud. Not to mention the omnipresence of Tiamat this edition.
Asmodeus is not a real god, even if the name has origins in occultism.

Tiamat is, again, deeply decontextualized, bearing no resemblance to the vague namesake.

They plainly stated (and by "they" here I mean the same editor in charge of this upcoming product) in the OD&D collection that they would not reprint the Gods supplement from OD&D in book form because it was inappropriate.

Still, don't expect any Egyptian or Sunerian gods in this pair of books.
 

Asmodeus is not a real god, even if the name has origins in occultism.

Tiamat is, again, deeply decontextualized, bearing no resemblance to the vague namesake.

They plainly stated (and by "they" here I mean the same editor in charge of this upcoming product) in the OD&D collection that they would not reprint the Gods supplement from OD&D in book form because it was inappropriate.

Still, don't expect any Egyptian or Sunerian gods in this pair of books.
I prefer the "esque" approach that borrows from, rather than misrepresents. It feels wiser.

There can be settings that do deep dives into Egyptian mythological accuracy − but Forgotten Realms kitchen sink isnt one of these.
 

Asmodeus is not a real god, even if the name has origins in occultism.

Tiamat is, again, deeply decontextualized, bearing no resemblance to the vague namesake.

They plainly stated (and by "they" here I mean the same editor in charge of this upcoming product) in the OD&D collection that they would not reprint the Gods supplement from OD&D in book form because it was inappropriate.

Still, don't expect any Egyptian or Sunerian gods in this pair of books.
It was inappropriate because of some of the pantheons and IP chosen lol. In terms of real world religion and mythology, let's just have look at a small selection of the new DMG. We have referenced:
River Oceanus
River Styx
Yggdrasil
The Abyss
Thanatos
Orcus
Baphomet
Acheron
Orthrys
Elysium
Gehenna
Hades
Niflheim
Pluton
The Seven Heavens
The Nine Hells
Asmodeus
Mammon
Mephistopheles
Dis
Cania
Cocytus
Pandemomium
Musphelheim
Nidavellir

Do I need more?
 

It was inappropriate because of some of the pantheons and IP chosen lol. In terms of real world religion and mythology, let's just have look at a small selection of the new DMG. We have referenced:
River Oceanus
River Styx
Yggdrasil
The Abyss
Thanatos
Orcus
Baphomet
Acheron
Orthrys
Elysium
Gehenna
Hades
Niflheim
Pluton
The Seven Heavens
The Nine Hells
Asmodeus
Mammon
Mephistopheles
Dis
Cania
Cocytus
Pandemomium
Musphelheim
Nidavellir

Do I need more?
Right, still proving the point, no real gods.

If you must insist, the explicitly stated policy is that each line of text in each D&D book has to be approved by two seperate sensitivity readers. So, yeah, I guess that is a bit more nuanced than "no real world religion" but the result is they won't have real Sumerian and Egyptian gods in the book.
 

Right, still proving the point, no real gods.

If you must insist, the explicitly stated policy is that each line of text in each D&D book has to be approved by two seperate sensitivity readers. So, yeah, I guess that is a bit more nuanced than "no real world religion" but the result is they won't have real Sumerian and Egyptian gods in the book.
Egyptians are proud and sensitive about their Egyptian cultural heritage. There was even an outcry because some movie didnt portray Cleopatra as Greek enough. The Egyptian gods require caution when utilizing in a gaming product.
 


Right, still proving the point, no real gods.

If you must insist, the explicitly stated policy is that each line of text in each D&D book has to be approved by two seperate sensitivity readers. So, yeah, I guess that is a bit more nuanced than "no real world religion" but the result is they won't have real Sumerian and Egyptian gods in the book.
In 2023, they published a book that features the Anakim from the Torah, the Enochian Watchers, and Samael. I don't think Dragonborn Enlil scares them.
 



We'll find out in 11 days. I'll come back here and admit I'm wrong if they aren't there. Note I do consider a little line like "Since the Second Sundering they have taken new names" to be the same as them still being there for obvious reasons.
Complete wipeout, take that to the bank.

I expect them to focus on how Aasamir wield power in Mulhorand and Unther, and something about gods...but zero nod to real gods.
 

Remove ads

Top