Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scribe" data-source="post: 8741754" data-attributes="member: 6807152">I object to the idea that a single Fighter, (applying 5e terms) would be able to defeat what is a party (if not larger) level threat, solo, and yes to narrate it in such a way as was presented in the video.I do not believe a group of Fighters, should be able to defeat such a Monster, and that it should take a 'balanced' party with buffs, debuffs, healing, magic, and yes Magic Items, for a Fighter to be the essential spear point.I dont hate Fighters/Martials, love them. I just absolutely believe that the game is better, when you have a diverse party with diverse roles, with strengths AND WEAKNESSES that the various party members must cover each other for. Nobody should 'swing a sword' better than a Fighter, it shouldnt be close. So take that Fighter's strength, add in the Clerics strengths, the Wizards, the Bards, and suddenly that Fighter, is greater than than he could ever be.Its like Raid Buffs in MMO's. I love those, because your Character will never be as powerful alone, as it is when you are playing with your friends.The idea of running a party of 4 Martial classes with no Magic and no Healing, is nonsensical to me.</blockquote>