Paul Farquhar
Legend
Well, the skull is in there - you would expect to see shards of bone flying out.Yeah, I have never seen a head explode in real life, so I have no idea how realistic that is
Well, the skull is in there - you would expect to see shards of bone flying out.Yeah, I have never seen a head explode in real life, so I have no idea how realistic that is
Came across this article that might be of interest to you: MSNAlso just wanted to say I am really enjoying the points you are making even if I am not always on the same page.
I think they have to be done as part of the greater whole. I watch a movie like Mad Max: Fury Road which has tons of CGI as well as models and then just plain ol camera work and angles and it’s a thing of beauty.There's a place for CGI, but well done practical effects are way cooler, IMO. But I'm old, so it's probably just my bias.
The Lego Movie IS a depiction of Lovecraftian Horror. The scene where he falls off the table is largely similar to the premise of From Beyond, The Render of the Veils, Lord of Illusion, Double Cosmos, Periphery, Assemblage Point, The Touch-Stone, Five Characters in Search of an Exit, In The Mouth of Madness, The Circular Ruins, The After Hours, The Unpleasant Profession of Jonathan Hoag, and the opening of The Great God Pan. It didn't scare me since I saw it as an adult, but given that I was scared when I first saw the witch from The Little Mermaid and the industrial accidents in Willy Wonka it probably would have scared me if I saw it as a kid.Must be "horror". Yeah, I'm using Fight Club rules for emphasis. We're talking about something actually scary. If you want to go non-traditional by arguing that The Lego Movie is a terrifying depiction of Lovecraftian horror, you need to be able to back it up with serious discussion about why is actually scares you, not just academic posturing.
Plus it doesn't have that moronic reincarnation romance subplot that got tacked onto all the later adaptationsDracula (1931): The Bela Lugosi classic is almost a century old. It might seem quaint by today's standards, but it's a good movie and Lugosi set the gold standard for cinema vampires. If you've never seen it, I encourage you to give it a chance.
I found this one tedious. It was just Michael lurking discretely in the background for 90% of the film like some kind of horror version of Where's Waldo. Then there's a couple of blink and you'll miss it murders. And then Michael walks away after getting a clip emptied into him, despite the movie not giving any indication that he's in any way paranormal. At the very least it was not up to the standard of John Carpenter's other work such as The Thing, In The Mouth of Madness, Prince of Darkness, and Big Trouble In Little ChinaHalloween
I'll admit I'm not the biggest fan of "slasher" movies. They're a little bit basic, as horror goes. But this movie is absolute perfection of the art form. From the soundtrack to the shot composition to the editing, this is a masterclass in horror film making
Do you mean Evil Dead 1 or Evil Dead 4? (or Evil Dead 5, which is the main body horror one)Evil Dead - I think this might be the reason I dont like body horror
Was the professor supposed to be the scariest character in the film? He's the only one that came off to me as potentially dangerous. Victor was harmless, and of the two deaths caused by the monster one was a slapstick accident and the other was unambiguous self-defenseFrankenstein (1931): Another classic that's nearly it's 100th anniversary. It's a good movie with some iconic scenes and Boris Karloff defined the look of Frankenstein for the last 90 years. Quaint by our standards, but a nice movie.
Well, the skull is in there - you would expect to see shards of bone flying out.
I think they have to be done as part of the greater whole. I watch a movie like Mad Max: Fury Road which has tons of CGI as well as models and then just plain ol camera work and angles and it’s a thing of beauty.
Dracula (1931): The Bela Lugosi classic is almost a century old. It might seem quaint by today's standards, but it's a good movie and Lugosi set the gold standard for cinema vampires. If you've never seen it, I encourage you to give it a chance.
Plus it doesn't have that moronic reincarnation romance subplot that got tacked onto all the later adaptations
Return of the Living Dead - Not as scary as Night of the Living Dead but more interesting and apparently the source of the concept of zombies eating brains
Where did that element first come in? I assume it was there before Ravenloft! I suppose it jumped from Jewel of the Seven Stars, probably in one of the Universal or Hammer movies.reincarnation element

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.