Zarrock God of Evil
First Post
Psion said:
It wasn't meant as an attack. To be sure not to get these responses from us tired ones just be sure to spell it out
...Oh yeah - and I'm evil so what do you expect....
-Zarrock
Last edited:
Best (previously forbidden) 3E Race/Class Combination
- Thread starter Bronn Spellforger
- Start date
It wasn't meant as an attack. To be sure not to get these responses from us tired ones just be sure to spell it out
...Oh yeah - and I'm evil so what do you expect....
-Zarrock
Tom Cashel
First Post
Just wanted to note that the perpetrator of this thread, Bronn Spellforger, plays a dwarf invoker in the campaign that I DM. He's still waiting to hit 5th level and gain those "nukes" that everyone loves. 
Side note: Reading the past seven or so posts made me think of the whole rationale behind the dwarven +2 bonus vs. Spells--the fact that they are "non-magical" creatures, or to put it less bluntly, not prone to wizardry. So I guess we need a new rationale for the +2 bonus...something that doesn't tend to rule out the dwarf "spellforgers." Just high CON or racial "toughness" (not the Feat)?
Side note: Reading the past seven or so posts made me think of the whole rationale behind the dwarven +2 bonus vs. Spells--the fact that they are "non-magical" creatures, or to put it less bluntly, not prone to wizardry. So I guess we need a new rationale for the +2 bonus...something that doesn't tend to rule out the dwarf "spellforgers." Just high CON or racial "toughness" (not the Feat)?
Left-handed Hummingbird
First Post
Halfling Barbarians for that lovely Dark Sun savage feeling. They aren't evil, they just don't think there is anything wrong in hunting the other PC races for food. I mean, it's not like elves or human are, like, people!
They kick!
They kick!
MythandLore
First Post
Just make it a +2 because they are more adept at defending themselves against magic due to their physical toughness and mental fortitude or something.Tom Cashel said:
The Sunderer
First Post
Dwarven spellcasters are good!
But where does it say that they have to have a toad familliar?
But where does it say that they have to have a toad familliar?
Henry
Autoexreginated
The Sunderer said:
They don't HAVE to, but having a +4 to your CON score never hurts for a wizard.
Dawrven Wizards just have a personality all their own - and I personally one day want to play a wild-haired dwarven rune-wizard with high CON and INT but extremely low CHA and WIS that acts half-mad and casts fireballs at near-point-blank ranges, but knows all sorts of forbidden stuff.
