Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 8359371" data-attributes="member: 12731">The legality and morality doesn't interest me. What intrigues me is what made it come to this very public clash, and Scarlett's true motivation.For example, it would be awesome if she used the lawsuit just to force Disney to the negotiation table, and once there, they'd agree that Ms Johansson will donate an unspecified sum* to a fund for struggling actors (say) and Disney will then contribute twice that sum to the same foundation. *) A sum insiders will guess to be in the region of maybe $10 to $20 millionAnd then Scarlett, with Disney CEO Bob Chapel by her side at a press conference, surprisingly says she's decided to start a fund for struggling actresses, and call it The Red Room, a term so generic Disney can try and fail to copyright, and that she's donating $150 million (most of her wealth) and then smiles at Bob. All the cameras turns to look at him compelling him to grin and fork over $300 mill then and there.As many articles have stated Scarlett is one of the few actresses that don't need Disney. And as I am stating now, Scarlett is very suited to providing a very sweet "frak you" smile [emoji16]</blockquote>