Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Blackguard Design & Development is up.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aegeri" data-source="post: 5514658" data-attributes="member: 78116"><p>Let's just look at powers that the Blackguard might be able to take (theoretically), but just the paladin in general for now. You also appear confused because the Blackguard <em>isn't a defender</em> - it's actually a striker (Much like how the slayer is a striker build of the fighter, not that fighters can't adequately pull off a secondary striker role anyway). But none the less:</p><p></p><p>Holy Strike (Paladin): Which grants a bonus to Wisdom damage against marked enemies (Damn solid that one). That's far better.</p><p></p><p>Valiant Strike (Paladin): Grants a bonus to the attack roll equal to the number of enemies adjacent for you (good for multimarking paladins).</p><p></p><p>Strike of Hope (Paladin): Grants 5 temp HP to an ally within 5, grants an additional 5 temp HP to the ally if they are bloodied.</p><p></p><p>Vengeful Strike (Paladin): Does radiant damage right off the bat, grants extra radiant damage and does +charisma damage if a bloodied ally is within 5.</p><p></p><p>Now 2 of these are what I think are situational - in the same category as this power. Would you rather have a poor at-will that basically <em>might</em> let you get CA - easily got in a wide variety of ways - or would you rather at-wills like the above that are useful in a wide variety of situations? All 4 of the above are paladin at-wills, so I didn't need to go far to easily show you four <em>much better</em> powers. When Valiant strike is required, it is amazing and serves a multimarking paladin well. Vengeful strike deals one of the best damage types in the game off the bat and can deal extra radiant damage. Those are 'conditional' at-wills, which are still far better than this.</p><p></p><p>Noting that - this is important - nothing stops a blackguard taking these at-wills unless he's pigeonholed into at-wills by his vice (which would just be a shame). The simple thing here is if you're another paladin or let's just say this was a fighter power: Do you honestly think this power would in any way stack up to other at-wills of these classes? Would normal paladins take this power? Quite frankly, it's not stacking up against paladin powers and we know the Blackguard can take them (theoretically of course). When you rely on CA for class features, there are <em>much</em> more reliable ways of doing it and my point about wintertouched/lasting frost is that will turn <em>all</em> of your powers into doing this by default.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Take a feat like <a href="http://www.wizards.com/dndinsider/compendium/feat.aspx?id=3518" target="_blank">cunning stalker</a> and then you get CA against any isolated creature. If you have friends, it's likely you have flanking and against everything else that might be isolated - automatically - you have CA. This feat is just far more generally useful and will serve the function most people who have tried to defend this at-will have used: Attacking "isolated" strong targets. </p><p></p><p>Well now you don't need to worry in the first place. Cunning stalker is also terrific for a blackguard who wants to charge an isolated enemy, gain CA on the charge and potentially hit far harder (+1 charging, +2 CA if the enemy has nothing else adjacent to it is very solid - all without ever needing to hit in the first place!).</p><p></p><p>Sure, if it was the general standard of at-wills it wouldn't be terrible. You compare it to the above and tell me out of say, those 5 choices - what would you take? Look at the two situational powers above and tell me what you'd rather have. This power: Or would you rather Valiant Strike? Or would you rather have Vengeful Strike? Both are equally situational, but they are far better for what they do.</p><p></p><p>For me, I wouldn't be so harsh on this if: The CA was an effect - or - the CA was granted to all. As it is the other at-wills the blackguard has have to be <em>pretty bad</em> for this to be a good choice. Alternatively, if it could be used as a MBA I would totally see and understand the point.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Cunning stalker. Good at wills last 3 tiers of play, not just heroic and even then, not until you take a single feat <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aegeri, post: 5514658, member: 78116"] Let's just look at powers that the Blackguard might be able to take (theoretically), but just the paladin in general for now. You also appear confused because the Blackguard [i]isn't a defender[/i] - it's actually a striker (Much like how the slayer is a striker build of the fighter, not that fighters can't adequately pull off a secondary striker role anyway). But none the less: Holy Strike (Paladin): Which grants a bonus to Wisdom damage against marked enemies (Damn solid that one). That's far better. Valiant Strike (Paladin): Grants a bonus to the attack roll equal to the number of enemies adjacent for you (good for multimarking paladins). Strike of Hope (Paladin): Grants 5 temp HP to an ally within 5, grants an additional 5 temp HP to the ally if they are bloodied. Vengeful Strike (Paladin): Does radiant damage right off the bat, grants extra radiant damage and does +charisma damage if a bloodied ally is within 5. Now 2 of these are what I think are situational - in the same category as this power. Would you rather have a poor at-will that basically [I]might[/I] let you get CA - easily got in a wide variety of ways - or would you rather at-wills like the above that are useful in a wide variety of situations? All 4 of the above are paladin at-wills, so I didn't need to go far to easily show you four [I]much better[/I] powers. When Valiant strike is required, it is amazing and serves a multimarking paladin well. Vengeful strike deals one of the best damage types in the game off the bat and can deal extra radiant damage. Those are 'conditional' at-wills, which are still far better than this. Noting that - this is important - nothing stops a blackguard taking these at-wills unless he's pigeonholed into at-wills by his vice (which would just be a shame). The simple thing here is if you're another paladin or let's just say this was a fighter power: Do you honestly think this power would in any way stack up to other at-wills of these classes? Would normal paladins take this power? Quite frankly, it's not stacking up against paladin powers and we know the Blackguard can take them (theoretically of course). When you rely on CA for class features, there are [I]much[/I] more reliable ways of doing it and my point about wintertouched/lasting frost is that will turn [I]all[/I] of your powers into doing this by default. Take a feat like [URL="http://www.wizards.com/dndinsider/compendium/feat.aspx?id=3518"]cunning stalker[/URL] and then you get CA against any isolated creature. If you have friends, it's likely you have flanking and against everything else that might be isolated - automatically - you have CA. This feat is just far more generally useful and will serve the function most people who have tried to defend this at-will have used: Attacking "isolated" strong targets. Well now you don't need to worry in the first place. Cunning stalker is also terrific for a blackguard who wants to charge an isolated enemy, gain CA on the charge and potentially hit far harder (+1 charging, +2 CA if the enemy has nothing else adjacent to it is very solid - all without ever needing to hit in the first place!). Sure, if it was the general standard of at-wills it wouldn't be terrible. You compare it to the above and tell me out of say, those 5 choices - what would you take? Look at the two situational powers above and tell me what you'd rather have. This power: Or would you rather Valiant Strike? Or would you rather have Vengeful Strike? Both are equally situational, but they are far better for what they do. For me, I wouldn't be so harsh on this if: The CA was an effect - or - the CA was granted to all. As it is the other at-wills the blackguard has have to be [I]pretty bad[/I] for this to be a good choice. Alternatively, if it could be used as a MBA I would totally see and understand the point. Cunning stalker. Good at wills last 3 tiers of play, not just heroic and even then, not until you take a single feat :p [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Blackguard Design & Development is up.
Top