diaglo
Adventurer
arnwyn said:Ignoring the real trolls, of course. Negative WotC reviews had a history of getting bashed here (a while ago, at least).
and some of the reviews were just plain removed. i know the ones i did were.
arnwyn said:Ignoring the real trolls, of course. Negative WotC reviews had a history of getting bashed here (a while ago, at least).
Well, it has stood the test of time in a thread about people mentioning books they don't like, I suppose. Bland it is, but poorly done? I didn't agree then, and I don't agree now. I didn't call you a troll then, and I'm not doing it now. But your opinion is hardly universal on the topic. Heck, it's hardly universal in this thread.Joshua Dyal said:It's funny; when I wrote my review of the ELH here for the site, saying essentially that it was incredibly bland, uninspiring and poorly done (with the exception of the monster chapter) I had people all over my case saying I was a troll, and my review should be pulled.
I guess that opinion's stood the test of time based on the responses here. Where were all you folks then, I wonder?![]()
I find FR's "new" planes to be much more bland than the Great Wheel. And I find FR's new metaplot to be bland as well. So I'm with Bran, here.Gez said:The PGTF had info on Faerûn's planes and detailed the metaplot for those who don't read novels. So, it's not all that bland.
- Excuse me? -greywulf said:Outside d20, I'd say all of these are eclisped by the blandest RPG product ever. GURPS. All of it.
Is not.arnwyn said:It is all that bland.
greywulf said:Outside d20, I'd say all of these are eclisped by the blandest RPG product ever. GURPS. All of it.
diaglo said:and some of the reviews were just plain removed. i know the ones i did were.