Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="StreamOfTheSky" data-source="post: 4160758" data-attributes="member: 35909">You're just healing TWO points of damage per attack, and if you want more than one attack, you're likely full attacking, thus leaving you open to the foe's full attack all to heal what an equivalent level cleric could with CLW, at the cost of your action.&nbsp; Is it really that broken, in practice?&nbsp; I'd still not allow it cause it's silly, but it doesn't seem so bad to me.Heh, this kinda reminds me of my idea when CArcane came out to have a Rogue with UMD use non-lethal sneak attacks on party members with cure minor wounds.&nbsp; Ah, did that one ever get shot down by the DM.&nbsp; Good times.&nbsp;&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="StreamOfTheSky, post: 4160758, member: 35909"] You're just healing TWO points of damage per attack, and if you want more than one attack, you're likely full attacking, thus leaving you open to the foe's full attack all to heal what an equivalent level cleric could with CLW, at the cost of your action. Is it really that broken, in practice? I'd still not allow it cause it's silly, but it doesn't seem so bad to me. Heh, this kinda reminds me of my idea when CArcane came out to have a Rogue with UMD use non-lethal sneak attacks on party members with cure minor wounds. Ah, did that one ever get shot down by the DM. Good times. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification