Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Boop
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marandahir" data-source="post: 7906612" data-attributes="member: 6803643"><p>I think the crux of the matter here is that 5e doesn’t play like 4e.</p><p></p><p>It’s a boatload more simplified in combat so as to prevent the game from requiring miniatures/battle mats. </p><p></p><p>Characters just don’t have as many powers as they did in 4e. Spellcasters might, but even there the arcane spells/divine prayers/primal evocations/psionic powers have been codified again into a single Spells chapter, so different classes access the same powers (so fewer unique magical powers over all).</p><p></p><p>It’s a different game. I love 4e, but not everything that was a Class in 4e is going to be a class in 5e. The editions have different ideas of what it means to have a class. In 4e, a Swordmage could be its own class, but while one could build an arcane-fighter halfcaster, it’s very hard to find a broad flavour there that has lots of room for subclasses of differing ideas. It works well enough as subclasses for various different casters/noncasters.</p><p></p><p>Warlord is an example of a class with a really cool mechanic but not much story difference for what makes them not a Fighter, and what makes an Inspiring Warlord different from a Tactical Warlord different from a Bravura or Resourceful or Skirmishing or Insightful one.</p><p></p><p>That’s why I brought up Battle Master and Banneret Fighters, Mastermind Rogue, the Superior Technique Fighting Style, and the Martial Adept feat. The Warlord is a concept that fits into different wings of different classes. A Bravura Warlord inspiring with courage from the frontlines functions differently from a LazyLord moving around allies like chess pieces and granting them attacks, functions differently from a skirmishing fighter leader functions differently from a master of tactical abilities.</p><p></p><p>We now have a fourth alternative access into that tactical system, so there’s lots of ways to capture the flavour of a 4e Warlord within 5e.</p><p></p><p>Want to play an Insightful Skirmishing Warlord? Take Archery or Thrown Weapon Fighting Style alongside Battle Master or Banneret. Have a higher wisdom score. Multiclass Scout Rogue or Ranger if you’re really seeking that Aragorn-like character.</p><p></p><p>But you’re fooling yourselves if you think 5e can ever accurately reflect the specific tactical game play of 4e. The game doesn’t try to do that and it’s ill-suited to shoe-horn the feature in.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marandahir, post: 7906612, member: 6803643"] I think the crux of the matter here is that 5e doesn’t play like 4e. It’s a boatload more simplified in combat so as to prevent the game from requiring miniatures/battle mats. Characters just don’t have as many powers as they did in 4e. Spellcasters might, but even there the arcane spells/divine prayers/primal evocations/psionic powers have been codified again into a single Spells chapter, so different classes access the same powers (so fewer unique magical powers over all). It’s a different game. I love 4e, but not everything that was a Class in 4e is going to be a class in 5e. The editions have different ideas of what it means to have a class. In 4e, a Swordmage could be its own class, but while one could build an arcane-fighter halfcaster, it’s very hard to find a broad flavour there that has lots of room for subclasses of differing ideas. It works well enough as subclasses for various different casters/noncasters. Warlord is an example of a class with a really cool mechanic but not much story difference for what makes them not a Fighter, and what makes an Inspiring Warlord different from a Tactical Warlord different from a Bravura or Resourceful or Skirmishing or Insightful one. That’s why I brought up Battle Master and Banneret Fighters, Mastermind Rogue, the Superior Technique Fighting Style, and the Martial Adept feat. The Warlord is a concept that fits into different wings of different classes. A Bravura Warlord inspiring with courage from the frontlines functions differently from a LazyLord moving around allies like chess pieces and granting them attacks, functions differently from a skirmishing fighter leader functions differently from a master of tactical abilities. We now have a fourth alternative access into that tactical system, so there’s lots of ways to capture the flavour of a 4e Warlord within 5e. Want to play an Insightful Skirmishing Warlord? Take Archery or Thrown Weapon Fighting Style alongside Battle Master or Banneret. Have a higher wisdom score. Multiclass Scout Rogue or Ranger if you’re really seeking that Aragorn-like character. But you’re fooling yourselves if you think 5e can ever accurately reflect the specific tactical game play of 4e. The game doesn’t try to do that and it’s ill-suited to shoe-horn the feature in. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Boop
Top