Botte secrete ----->Feats?

Seeing that we have a few historical swordfighting enthusiasts, and thinking about the "secret techniques" that certain masters were said to teach (a popular theme in swashbuckling novels, and more than open to a certain amount of debate), have any of you converted such into feats for 3.x? Or translated them into any sort of mechanics, or just handwave it and say that it would be part of your attack, critical hit, or whatever?
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Ah, the botte segrete, the great legend of Western swordsmanship. In a "realistic" setting, they wouldn't amount to anything, since all the swordmasters would be teaching the same "secrets". In a properly overclocked legendary setting (what D20 does well), I'd say that various Feats could fit the bill.

Okay, here are some based on various legendary "secrets" I've read about:

Universal Parry (historically talked about in the 1700s and later)
This was purported to be a defense that could not be penetrated. Therefore, when someone with this feat makes no attacks at all in a round and wields an appropriate sword, he cannot be hit at all by any melee attack.
Prerequisites: I've had to much bourbon tonight to bother with that--somebody else can think them up.

Universal Strike (historically talked about in the 1500s and 1600s)
This was purported to be a special "secret strike" that could not be defended against. Someone with this feat may, once per round, make a single attack that ignores all worn armor, all defenses that are negated by being flat-footed, and all bonuses to AC that come from worn armor.
Prerequisites--did I mention that it was barrel-strength bourbon I was sipping?

Long Strike (historically talked about in the 1500s)
This was purported to greatly increase the range at which a swordsman could hit without endangering himself. Someone with this feat has a "five-foot-step" that is TEN feet long, but only once per round. This does not trigger any attacks of opportunity.
Prerequisites: You figure it out.
 

In my campaign, I have two feats, Secrets of the New Style, and Secrets of the Old Style.

Secrets of the New Style
You have trained in a modern, secretive sword technique.
Prerequisites: Jump 4+ ranks, Tumble 4+ ranks.
Benefit: You may perform a special lunge as part of an attack. Your reach extends an extra 5 ft., and you get a +2 bonus to your attack rolls, but you take a -2 penalty to AC for the next round, and you can only attack a single foe. You forfeit your attacks of opportunity for the round. You can use this feat both with single attacks and full attacks, but not attacks of opportunity.

When a foe uses this feat against you, he does not gain the +2 bonus to his attack rolls, since you know how to defend against it.


Secrets of the Old Style
You have trained in an ancient, secretive sword technique.
Prerequisites: Weapon Focus, Knowledge (history) 4 ranks.
Benefit: Choose a sword you have Weapon Focus in. You can use your Intelligence modifier to attack rolls instead of your Strength modifier when fighting with the chosen weapon. Additionally, you can qualify for Weapon Specialization and later feats in that chain as if you were a Fighter of your character level.


Dogbrain said:
Universal Parry (historically talked about in the 1700s and later)
This was purported to be a defense that could not be penetrated. Therefore, when someone with this feat makes no attacks at all in a round and wields an appropriate sword, he cannot be hit at all by any melee attack.
Prerequisites: I've had to much bourbon tonight to bother with that--somebody else can think them up.

Universal Parry
Your mastery of the art of defense can block any attack.
Prerequisites: Dex 13, Int 13, Combat Expertise, Combat Reflexes, Dodge, Greater Weapon Focus, Greater Weapon Specialization, Lightning Reflexes, Weapon Focus, Weapon Specialization, base attack bonus +20, Sense Motive 10 ranks.
Benefit: Whenever a melee or ranged attack would hit you, if you are armed with a melee weapon you have Greater Weapon Specialization in, you may expend an attack of opportunity for this round. If you do, the attack instead misses.

Universal Strike (historically talked about in the 1500s and 1600s)
This was purported to be a special "secret strike" that could not be defended against. Someone with this feat may, once per round, make a single attack that ignores all worn armor, all defenses that are negated by being flat-footed, and all bonuses to AC that come from worn armor.
Prerequisites--did I mention that it was barrel-strength bourbon I was sipping?

Universal Strike
You have perfected the attack, and your weapon will never again miss a mortal target.
Prerequisites: Dex 19, Int 13, Combat Expertise, Greater Weapon Focus, Greater Weapon Specialization, Improved Critical, Improved Feint, Improved Precise Shot, Point Blank Shot, Precise Shot, Weapon Focus, Weapon Specialization, base attack bonus +20, Bluff 10 ranks, Heal 10 ranks.
Benefit: When you make a melee attack with a weapon you have Greater Weapon Specialization in, the target is considered flat-footed, and you need only succeed a touch attack to hit. You can ignore any concealment or cover less than total.
 

Maybe you can do several feats of much the same vein for the monk. After all, there's definitely a spiritual resemblance between swashbucklers and kung-fu stories.
 



Prince of Happiness said:
There is?

Yes, there is. There's lots of technique-babble in some kung-fu comics. There's one for Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon where they go into named moves.

My suggestion is just to come up with some cool-sounding names, or steal the names if you have to, and make them into feats. You can make Parting the Silk into a feat, as well as Cappo Ferro from Princess Bride, etc.
 

(Psi)SeveredHead said:
Yes, there is. There's lots of technique-babble in some kung-fu comics. There's one for Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon where they go into named moves.

My suggestion is just to come up with some cool-sounding names, or steal the names if you have to, and make them into feats. You can make Parting the Silk into a feat, as well as Cappo Ferro from Princess Bride, etc.

Ah, you're talking about technique. I was wondering to myself "so...you mean for me to believe that D'artagnan could offer full debates and critiques on Confucianism vs. Taoism?"
 

Prince of Happiness said:
Ah, you're talking about technique. I was wondering to myself "so...you mean for me to believe that D'artagnan could offer full debates and critiques on Confucianism vs. Taoism?"

Not in the movies, certainly, but the older (19th century) swashbuckling literature had its share of highly educated protagonists--Aramis, for example.
 

Remove ads

Top