Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
C&C - Maybe A Dumb Question but . . .
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Treebore" data-source="post: 3653786" data-attributes="member: 10177"><p>I would say it is not limiting. In a way 3E is more limiting than C&C. This is because in C&C any character can attempt just about any kind of action covered by feats in 3E. You can't do that with the rules as written in any edition of D&D. 1E/2E didin't account for such things until the optional books of 2E, and 3E says you can only do the action if you have the feat.</p><p></p><p>C&C says if you declare the action you can do it as long as the CK agrees its possible and has assigned the difficulty modifers. You succeed on the SIEGE check you perform the "feat" or action, or set up being able to perform the desired attack.</p><p></p><p>For an example, when a player wants to do what is called a Cleave or Great Cleave in 3E they roll a SIEGE check, with the modifiers being the HD of the creature or creatures you want to hit.</p><p></p><p>So if you take down a creature and you want to attempt a "Cleave attack" against the second creature standing near you you roll the SIEGE check. If you succeed you get to roll for another attack.</p><p></p><p>Now say your a 8th level character and your fighting a horde of skeletons or Zombies. Good situation for a Great Cleave/Whirlwind kind of action. So you tell me you want to try and hit 4 zombies with your attack. I add up the HD of the 4 zombies to calculate your Target Number (DC in 3E terminology) and if you beat it, roll a successful hit, AND roll damage greater than their HP you sweep all of them into a pile of undead remains.</p><p></p><p>So if in my game you had already earned the "Great Cleave feat" I wouldn't have you roll the SIEGE check for setting up the opportunity for the maneuver. You'll automatically set it up due to having the feat and just roll the to hit. If you had earned the "Cleave Feat" I would have subtracted one of the Zombie's HD from your TN for the SIEGE check.</p><p></p><p>So C&C is much less limiting in that you can try anything you can imagine, as long as the CK agrees it is possible. You just have to roll for it. In 3E you get to do it if you have the feat, but can't do it if you don't have the feat.</p><p></p><p>So that is what I mean by "limited" versus "unlimited" with regards to C&C and its SIEGE engine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Treebore, post: 3653786, member: 10177"] I would say it is not limiting. In a way 3E is more limiting than C&C. This is because in C&C any character can attempt just about any kind of action covered by feats in 3E. You can't do that with the rules as written in any edition of D&D. 1E/2E didin't account for such things until the optional books of 2E, and 3E says you can only do the action if you have the feat. C&C says if you declare the action you can do it as long as the CK agrees its possible and has assigned the difficulty modifers. You succeed on the SIEGE check you perform the "feat" or action, or set up being able to perform the desired attack. For an example, when a player wants to do what is called a Cleave or Great Cleave in 3E they roll a SIEGE check, with the modifiers being the HD of the creature or creatures you want to hit. So if you take down a creature and you want to attempt a "Cleave attack" against the second creature standing near you you roll the SIEGE check. If you succeed you get to roll for another attack. Now say your a 8th level character and your fighting a horde of skeletons or Zombies. Good situation for a Great Cleave/Whirlwind kind of action. So you tell me you want to try and hit 4 zombies with your attack. I add up the HD of the 4 zombies to calculate your Target Number (DC in 3E terminology) and if you beat it, roll a successful hit, AND roll damage greater than their HP you sweep all of them into a pile of undead remains. So if in my game you had already earned the "Great Cleave feat" I wouldn't have you roll the SIEGE check for setting up the opportunity for the maneuver. You'll automatically set it up due to having the feat and just roll the to hit. If you had earned the "Cleave Feat" I would have subtracted one of the Zombie's HD from your TN for the SIEGE check. So C&C is much less limiting in that you can try anything you can imagine, as long as the CK agrees it is possible. You just have to roll for it. In 3E you get to do it if you have the feat, but can't do it if you don't have the feat. So that is what I mean by "limited" versus "unlimited" with regards to C&C and its SIEGE engine. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
C&C - Maybe A Dumb Question but . . .
Top