Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Canaan" data-source="post: 4408574" data-attributes="member: 40239">I was holding my breath when the first post about converting to 4e hit, waiting to see the responses and hoping against hope that the consensus was to stay with 3.5.  This isn't an anti-4e rant.  I don't have the credibilty to do that, as I have not played it.  But I have no interest in playing 4e.  I have good friends in my gaming group that have tried it and reported back to me, friends whose opinions I value because they have a similar play style and likes and dislikes as mine.  The comments were generally negative from my point of view, with the exception of a few things others have mentioned here.  Additionally, I don't own any of the books and don't feel the urge to spend money on a game system that seems obviously targeted and marketed to make you have to buy new books to get the breadth what the system has to offer.  I've already done that once with 3x and I'm not going to do it again ... lol!  Anyway, as for a battle where we try to convert our characters to 4e, I vote no.  Besides the fact that I am not really willing to try 4e, I do not want to spend the time required to convert Jaroth for one battle.  That being said, if everyone else would like to try it, I won't get in the way.  Perhaps Jaroth can get knocked unconscious or kidnapped for that battle and everyone else can try to save him or something. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />  That way, I don't have to convert him <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />laters.</blockquote>

Verification