Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Flipguarder" data-source="post: 4845154" data-attributes="member: 61430">Keterys I'm sorry to say that you completely ignored the point of this thread. You say that it IS a written rule. Well how about this:Lay on hands target is defined as one creature. It does not give an exception for living creature, it just says creature. Also the creature does not have to spend a healing surge, it just GETS healed. There is no exception saying that the dead cannot be healed.Those ARE written rules. The fact that they don't make sense to you based on other areas or ideas in the game is irrelevant based upon your own logic.What me and Subrosas are saying is that at some point exceptions being written in becomes unnecessary. Where we all decide these unnecessary exceptions lie is a matter of personal common sense and logic. There will be discrepancies between many. But the fact of the matter is, if you TRULY want to go by raw and nothing else, the dead can be healed with lay on hands.Obviously the other thread was MORE ambiguous and less ridiculous than this idea taken raw, but we still believe that it is an unnecessary-to-write-in exception to the bloodied rule. You can disagree, thats fine. But you can't point to the rule and say it can't have exceptions unless they are written in.</blockquote>