Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can a hasted bladesinger cast a cantrip with the haste extra action
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Xetheral" data-source="post: 8284444" data-attributes="member: 6802765"><p>I believe the confusion surrounding "melee weapon attack" was conclusively resolved, but the phrase "weapon attack" is still (arguably) ambiguous.</p><p></p><p>"Weapon attack" <em>could</em> be a superset that includes all "melee weapon attacks" and all "ranged weapon attacks" <em>or</em> it could mean "an attack with a weapon". The former interpretation is arguably stronger based on the game (as you note) apparently structurally dividing attacks into weapon attacks and spell attacks.</p><p></p><p>However, the latter interpretation is more consistent with the grammatical reasoning JC used when he explained that "melee weapon attacks" are "melee attacks made with a weapon" and not "attacks made with a melee weapon". He said that it was due to the lack of a hyphen between "melee" and "weapon". In other words, JC has tried to rely on the rules of English grammar to establish the meaning of "melee weapon attack" rather than state that the term is jargon. Applying the same logic to "weapon attack" suggests it should have its ordinary meaning of "an attack with a weapon". This is also consistent with the errata that lets unarmed strikes exceptionally be "melee weapon attacks" but says nothing about whether they are "weapon attacks". If it were true that all attacks were either weapon attacks or spell attacks, then arguably this errata would have been unnecessary.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Xetheral, post: 8284444, member: 6802765"] I believe the confusion surrounding "melee weapon attack" was conclusively resolved, but the phrase "weapon attack" is still (arguably) ambiguous. "Weapon attack" [I]could[/I] be a superset that includes all "melee weapon attacks" and all "ranged weapon attacks" [I]or[/I] it could mean "an attack with a weapon". The former interpretation is arguably stronger based on the game (as you note) apparently structurally dividing attacks into weapon attacks and spell attacks. However, the latter interpretation is more consistent with the grammatical reasoning JC used when he explained that "melee weapon attacks" are "melee attacks made with a weapon" and not "attacks made with a melee weapon". He said that it was due to the lack of a hyphen between "melee" and "weapon". In other words, JC has tried to rely on the rules of English grammar to establish the meaning of "melee weapon attack" rather than state that the term is jargon. Applying the same logic to "weapon attack" suggests it should have its ordinary meaning of "an attack with a weapon". This is also consistent with the errata that lets unarmed strikes exceptionally be "melee weapon attacks" but says nothing about whether they are "weapon attacks". If it were true that all attacks were either weapon attacks or spell attacks, then arguably this errata would have been unnecessary. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can a hasted bladesinger cast a cantrip with the haste extra action
Top