Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can A Spell Caster Out Damage a Martial Consistently?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 9663378" data-attributes="member: 6795602"><p>I mean there's probably hundreds of thousands of variations of martials. I don't think it's very meaningful to say 'aha, one martial out of all of them can do this thing'. My use of typical is meant to carve out space for that kind of exception while still maintaining the ability to generalize.</p><p></p><p>IMO. We either talk in generalizations to some degree or the terms martial and caster becomes meaningless themselves.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's really easy to build a survivable caster though. And without having to sacrifice very much.</p><p>1. You inherently have ranged options in a game where many enemies are either melee only or vastly more dangerous in melee.</p><p>2. You can easily level dip for armor if you don't have it.</p><p>3. You can get the shield spell via magic initiate origin feat, or worst case via single level multiclass.</p><p>4. You can use a few spell choices on various mobility, defense, summon and control spells to aid your survivability.</p><p>5. You can often maintain a strong control spell (either precast or cast on round 1) and spend the rest of the time dodging, while still having a large impact on combat.</p><p></p><p>And of course there's options for even tankier caster builds.</p><p></p><p>Melee focused martials though typically have to make significant sacrifices in order to layer in strong survivability.</p><p>1. If they want really good AC by taking a shield they give up alot of damage potential and possibly ranged potential as well.</p><p>2. They still need a way to handle enemies wanting to maintain range (either mobility, a servicable ranged attack, etc).</p><p>3. If they want high damage they typically need a feat, but their defensive options also come from feats.</p><p>4. A large portion of their damage comes from abilities that have offensive and defensive options. Reckless attack, battlemaster dice, smite spell slots. If one plays more defensively this even further tanks their damage.</p><p></p><p>It's very difficult to build an effective martial character focused on defense.</p><p></p><p></p><p>For what it's worth, one of my favorite characters was a Bear Barbarian/Swashbuckler Rogue back in 2014 rules with a fondness for grappling, high mobility, and utilizing sneak attack for strong opportunity attacks. I very rarely reckless attacked. I went more of a con focus than str or dex. My damage was a bit lower than it could have been, but as long as I was raging I was virtually unkillable (or at least the other PC's would die long before I would. This worked well only because I had enough control options and super high mobility layered into the build.</p><p></p><p>So yes, there's an example of an effective yet highly defensive martial, and yet I still had to really sacrifice damage potential. It pretty much required swashbuckler rogue for mobility, opportunity attack damage scaling and grappling ability.</p><p></p><p>But here's the thing. I don't actually think this character was more effective than something as simple as any spirit guardians cleric that primarily dodges when enemies are attacking him and that's without considering the rest of the cleric kit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrogReaver, post: 9663378, member: 6795602"] I mean there's probably hundreds of thousands of variations of martials. I don't think it's very meaningful to say 'aha, one martial out of all of them can do this thing'. My use of typical is meant to carve out space for that kind of exception while still maintaining the ability to generalize. IMO. We either talk in generalizations to some degree or the terms martial and caster becomes meaningless themselves. It's really easy to build a survivable caster though. And without having to sacrifice very much. 1. You inherently have ranged options in a game where many enemies are either melee only or vastly more dangerous in melee. 2. You can easily level dip for armor if you don't have it. 3. You can get the shield spell via magic initiate origin feat, or worst case via single level multiclass. 4. You can use a few spell choices on various mobility, defense, summon and control spells to aid your survivability. 5. You can often maintain a strong control spell (either precast or cast on round 1) and spend the rest of the time dodging, while still having a large impact on combat. And of course there's options for even tankier caster builds. Melee focused martials though typically have to make significant sacrifices in order to layer in strong survivability. 1. If they want really good AC by taking a shield they give up alot of damage potential and possibly ranged potential as well. 2. They still need a way to handle enemies wanting to maintain range (either mobility, a servicable ranged attack, etc). 3. If they want high damage they typically need a feat, but their defensive options also come from feats. 4. A large portion of their damage comes from abilities that have offensive and defensive options. Reckless attack, battlemaster dice, smite spell slots. If one plays more defensively this even further tanks their damage. It's very difficult to build an effective martial character focused on defense. For what it's worth, one of my favorite characters was a Bear Barbarian/Swashbuckler Rogue back in 2014 rules with a fondness for grappling, high mobility, and utilizing sneak attack for strong opportunity attacks. I very rarely reckless attacked. I went more of a con focus than str or dex. My damage was a bit lower than it could have been, but as long as I was raging I was virtually unkillable (or at least the other PC's would die long before I would. This worked well only because I had enough control options and super high mobility layered into the build. So yes, there's an example of an effective yet highly defensive martial, and yet I still had to really sacrifice damage potential. It pretty much required swashbuckler rogue for mobility, opportunity attack damage scaling and grappling ability. But here's the thing. I don't actually think this character was more effective than something as simple as any spirit guardians cleric that primarily dodges when enemies are attacking him and that's without considering the rest of the cleric kit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can A Spell Caster Out Damage a Martial Consistently?
Top