Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Can WotC Cater to Past Editions Without Compromising 4e Design?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pour" data-source="post: 5662596" data-attributes="member: 59411"><p>This discussion was started in the speculation thread involving the 2012 setting, but seems worthy of its own thread, basically what the title asks: Can WotC cater to past editions without compromising 4e design? Is it a question of resources, time, money? Is it worth it? What is gained or lost?</p><p></p><p>My own personal take is that something is compromised by, for instance, creating a campaign setting compatible with every edition as opposed to solely 4e. I'm not sure it has anything to do with money or manpower, but much more design direction. My biggest fear for D&D is for it to roll backward mechanically. The past editions are all alive and well, they are mostly being supported one way or another (though in a past thread someone did mention the original 3.5e technically isn't being supported, and I'm sure there's other pockets that aren't being catered to directly), and I want the same dedication from WotC with the current systems. I want their sole concern to be the development of the 4e framework and pushing the concepts forward, in creating new and uniquely 4e settings and classics, not, though [MENTION=23977]Scribble[/MENTION] will argue with me here, fall into an apologist rut, and by that I mean revert back to older designs without at least assessing their validity in the current design paradigms and mechanics, or, in the example above, working on past mechanics completely removed from 4e mechanics at the expense of 4e material in attempts to be more universal. </p><p></p><p>Scribble brought up that this belief is akin to the idea the board games are detracting from 4e, but I argue expanding the IP into board games, miniature games, video games, does not detract from the current edition in the same way WotC actively creating material for past editions does (and quite honestly I don't feel the board games detract at all). I just can't seem to figure out why I feel that way. Maybe I'm being irrational, overly-defensive of what I feel is a solid system. There is something to be said, however, in WotC working within 4th edition and branching into new territory and it including older editions into its developments.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pour, post: 5662596, member: 59411"] This discussion was started in the speculation thread involving the 2012 setting, but seems worthy of its own thread, basically what the title asks: Can WotC cater to past editions without compromising 4e design? Is it a question of resources, time, money? Is it worth it? What is gained or lost? My own personal take is that something is compromised by, for instance, creating a campaign setting compatible with every edition as opposed to solely 4e. I'm not sure it has anything to do with money or manpower, but much more design direction. My biggest fear for D&D is for it to roll backward mechanically. The past editions are all alive and well, they are mostly being supported one way or another (though in a past thread someone did mention the original 3.5e technically isn't being supported, and I'm sure there's other pockets that aren't being catered to directly), and I want the same dedication from WotC with the current systems. I want their sole concern to be the development of the 4e framework and pushing the concepts forward, in creating new and uniquely 4e settings and classics, not, though [MENTION=23977]Scribble[/MENTION] will argue with me here, fall into an apologist rut, and by that I mean revert back to older designs without at least assessing their validity in the current design paradigms and mechanics, or, in the example above, working on past mechanics completely removed from 4e mechanics at the expense of 4e material in attempts to be more universal. Scribble brought up that this belief is akin to the idea the board games are detracting from 4e, but I argue expanding the IP into board games, miniature games, video games, does not detract from the current edition in the same way WotC actively creating material for past editions does (and quite honestly I don't feel the board games detract at all). I just can't seem to figure out why I feel that way. Maybe I'm being irrational, overly-defensive of what I feel is a solid system. There is something to be said, however, in WotC working within 4th edition and branching into new territory and it including older editions into its developments. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Can WotC Cater to Past Editions Without Compromising 4e Design?
Top