Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="delericho" data-source="post: 5669529" data-attributes="member: 22424">I believe his &quot;post-3e D&amp;D&quot; includes 3e. Certainly, what he describes in the article is something that I've seen in 3e.Really? That's odd, and frankly a little disturbing. If WotC start their 5e push with a &quot;you can't roleplay in 4e&quot; meme that will be really tragic. Bashing the old edition was an awful approach in the 3e/4e transition; I sincerely hope they've learned that lesson.Indeed. Actually, since right after 4e hit I've suspected that an eventual 5e may well be a step back, not in mechanics, but in tone. Indeed, we may see another &quot;back to the dungeon&quot; push.But let's not write 4e off just yet. Mearls said at GenCon that his articles were more or less just him musing out loud. So we don't really have anything solid on which to predict the nature of 5e... nor even to say that they're seriously working on 5e.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="delericho, post: 5669529, member: 22424"] I believe his "post-3e D&D" [i]includes[/i] 3e. Certainly, what he describes in the article is something that I've seen in 3e. Really? That's odd, and frankly a little disturbing. If WotC start their 5e push with a "you can't roleplay in 4e" meme that will be really tragic. Bashing the old edition was an awful approach in the 3e/4e transition; I sincerely hope they've learned that lesson. Indeed. Actually, since right after 4e hit I've suspected that an eventual 5e may well be a step back, not in mechanics, but in tone. Indeed, we may see another "back to the dungeon" push. But let's not write 4e off just yet. Mearls said at GenCon that his articles were more or less just him musing out loud. So we don't really have anything solid on which to predict the nature of 5e... nor even to say that they're seriously working on 5e. [/QUOTE]

Verification