Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lyxen" data-source="post: 8433750" data-attributes="member: 7032025">And again, you offer no proof, whereas I've given you all the details from the RAW. So prove it according to RAW, since it is what matters to you. I have given you many quotes to back my claim, not please show me something more than your own personal interpretations.In any case, it's perceivable so you can interrupt it and teleport away. That is the exact purpose of an interruption. And you have consistently failed to prove that the attack sequence cannot be interrupted, whereas I have given you two proofs that it can.This is a pure invention from you. Prove it. Shield, a first level spell, is travelling back in time? Simply ridiculous. And Deflect Missile also winds back time ? Come on...Again, you are not reading the ready action properly. it INTERRUPTS whatever is happening on the other guy's turn. There is no limit to what it can interrupt, again, specific beats general, just as shield and deflect arrow does.It says nothing of the kind. Once more, you are inventing RAW. EVERYTHING YOU SAY is pure speculation on your part and totally unsupported by RAW. Please read the books.I'm sorry, but you backed down on counterspell, you backed down on Misty Step, so so far I don't see that I've been much wrong so far. The RAW does not say what you think it says, you have consistently failed to provide even a single sentence backing up any of your claims, whereas I have given you plenty, in particular:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">"First, you decide what perceivable circumstance will trigger your reaction." It does not have to be an action, just winding up for a strike is sufficient. Even "about to get hit" is sufficient actually. All these are perceivable, there is no way you can win this.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Nothing in "making an attack" suggests that it cannot be interrupted. If you think it can't, you will have to prove it.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">"If the reaction interrupts another creature's turn, that creature can continue its turn right after the reaction." So it clearly interrupts what is happening, whatever it is, there is no "unless it concerns an attack which cannot be interrupted..."</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">And actually, I have given you two cases of interruption which are RAW, and please don't claim that Deflect Missiles which is not even magical winds back an attack or travels in time.</li> </ul></blockquote>

Verification