Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
cancelled 5e announcement at Gencon??? Anyone know anything about this?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JamesonCourage" data-source="post: 5653007" data-attributes="member: 6668292"><p>I'll preface this by saying I don't play either 3.X or 4e.</p><p></p><p>I think the issue is that some people don't like the developers (that are understandably changing the game they're playing, with a new edition) to say what "badwrongfun" is. It's one thing for them to say, "this isn't our goal with this edition. Our goal is <em>this</em>." It's another to say, "yeah, who could have possibly enjoyed something like that? Seriously, nobody liked what we created."</p><p></p><p>I don't want the people that run the game I play to say what "badwrongfun" is. I understand when they say, "our goal doesn't support this choice" because the game can't support everything (even if it seems like D&D tries to, sometimes). Alienating a group of customers, even if it's small, is kind of a red flag to me, unless they really deserve it. A small segment of people that ended up liking some of the stuff released for the game? They don't really deserve ridicule, in my opinion.</p><p></p><p>Disagreement, I can understand. Shifting goals, I can understand. Making fun of something they liked? I don't like seeing that in a company. It makes me think they value their own preferences over that of their customers, and in a smaller hobby industry, that's disconcerting to me. It alienates me, even if they weren't making fun of me. Does that mean that they value their own preferences over that of their customers? No, it doesn't. But it sure can look or feel that way when they act childishly (the context of the quote in this thread makes me think they we're trying to act like the "cool kids" by bashing something they didn't particularly like).</p><p></p><p>That's just my thoughts on it. I'm not making a judgment on the actual character of the people in the discussion, but I am making a statement of how they come across to me, based on the quote and the context given. There are a lot of better ways to go about promoting your new product than alienating people who liked your old product.</p><p></p><p>Just my two cents. As always, play what you like <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JamesonCourage, post: 5653007, member: 6668292"] I'll preface this by saying I don't play either 3.X or 4e. I think the issue is that some people don't like the developers (that are understandably changing the game they're playing, with a new edition) to say what "badwrongfun" is. It's one thing for them to say, "this isn't our goal with this edition. Our goal is [I]this[/I]." It's another to say, "yeah, who could have possibly enjoyed something like that? Seriously, nobody liked what we created." I don't want the people that run the game I play to say what "badwrongfun" is. I understand when they say, "our goal doesn't support this choice" because the game can't support everything (even if it seems like D&D tries to, sometimes). Alienating a group of customers, even if it's small, is kind of a red flag to me, unless they really deserve it. A small segment of people that ended up liking some of the stuff released for the game? They don't really deserve ridicule, in my opinion. Disagreement, I can understand. Shifting goals, I can understand. Making fun of something they liked? I don't like seeing that in a company. It makes me think they value their own preferences over that of their customers, and in a smaller hobby industry, that's disconcerting to me. It alienates me, even if they weren't making fun of me. Does that mean that they value their own preferences over that of their customers? No, it doesn't. But it sure can look or feel that way when they act childishly (the context of the quote in this thread makes me think they we're trying to act like the "cool kids" by bashing something they didn't particularly like). That's just my thoughts on it. I'm not making a judgment on the actual character of the people in the discussion, but I am making a statement of how they come across to me, based on the quote and the context given. There are a lot of better ways to go about promoting your new product than alienating people who liked your old product. Just my two cents. As always, play what you like :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
cancelled 5e announcement at Gencon??? Anyone know anything about this?
Top