Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hell0W0rld" data-source="post: 9213769" data-attributes="member: 7043718">Aye, so the wizard should also be reliant on the fighter, correct? It's not a team game if someone is doing all the meaningful work and the other is left on the sidelines to mop up. See also the <a href="https://youtu.be/zFuMpYTyRjw" target="_blank">BMX Bandit and Angel Summoner</a> skits. They're on the same team but not contributing equally.You are correct that there's very few defensive packages for 5e's martials, but at least making casters interruptible will incentivize them to invest in defensive spells. If a caster invests more in defensive spells, they have less resources to go nova. This gives the non-casters more room to shine, as classes who are supposed to be solid throughout an adventuring day when the casters are out.The group that wants interruptible casters aren't those who think casters and martials are balanced. In fact, they're probably mutually exclusive...</blockquote>