Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ezo" data-source="post: 9215571" data-attributes="member: 7037866">Which is why weapon speed was a good thing. It demonstrated the difference in wielding a light, quick weapon compared to a heavier weapon. And the &quot;winding up&quot; to swing a Maul properly is part of the proficiency. And since we have no idea what a somatic component is comprised of, we don't know if it is just waving your hands around or something more elobrate.Did you not see the last bullet?<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">And on and on and on...</li>
</ul>The list was hardly meant to be exhaustive.Wow, I think you aren't even reading my posts. Or you are simply &quot;seeing red&quot; with certain parts to the point of becoming obvilious to the rest?Pretty much if you are doing anything to distract you from dealing with the opponent directly in front of you, it could leave an opening for that opponent to get in a hit. Many such things should be done with disadvantage or at some penalty unless you are foregoing your defense against that opponent to accomplish the other task.Sure, making the attack with the weapon. The &quot;without&quot; should have been &quot;with&quot; and was simply a type-o. I'll edit the post to avoid further confusion. Thanks for pointing it out.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ezo, post: 9215571, member: 7037866"] Which is why weapon speed was a good thing. It demonstrated the difference in wielding a light, quick weapon compared to a heavier weapon. And the "winding up" to swing a Maul properly is part of the proficiency. And since we have no idea what a somatic component is comprised of, we don't know if it is just waving your hands around or something more elobrate. Did you not see the last bullet? [LIST] [*]And on and on and on... [/LIST] The list was hardly meant to be exhaustive. Wow, I think you aren't even reading my posts. Or you are simply "seeing red" with certain parts to the point of becoming obvilious to the rest? Pretty much if you are doing anything to distract you from dealing with the opponent directly in front of you, it could leave an opening for that opponent to get in a hit. Many such things should be done with disadvantage or at some penalty unless you are foregoing your defense against that opponent to accomplish the other task. Sure, making the attack with the weapon. The "without" should have been "with" and was simply a type-o. I'll edit the post to avoid further confusion. Thanks for pointing it out. [/QUOTE]

Verification