Casting spells and alignment


log in or register to remove this ad



Yep, Wizards don't worry about good or evil. Clerics however do. Thus you might see a evil wizard casting a good spell IF they can get away with it. (IE they aren't trying to cast a divine spell.)
 

Just to clear things up a bit for myself. If a Cleric (Evil) casts summon monster, he can't get a Good creature as a possible option, correct?
 

Uriel said:
Just to clear things up a bit for myself. If a Cleric (Evil) casts summon monster, he can't get a Good creature as a possible option, correct?

Summon Monster, when used to summon a good creature, is a spell with the [Good] descriptor.

An evil cleric, or a cleric of an evil deity, cannot cast a spell with the [Good] descriptor.

So you're correct; an evil cleric cannot Summon a Celestial Badger, but an evil wizard can.

-Hyp.
 

A related question: can a multiclass cleric use his other class to cast forbidden spells? For instance, can a NG Clr/Wiz cast protection from good as an arcane spell?
 

AuraSeer said:
A related question: can a multiclass cleric use his other class to cast forbidden spells? For instance, can a NG Clr/Wiz cast protection from good as an arcane spell?

Based on the Specialist Wizard ruling precedent, I'd say yes.

-Hyp.
 

AuraSeer said:
A related question: can a multiclass cleric use his other class to cast forbidden spells? For instance, can a NG Clr/Wiz cast protection from good as an arcane spell?
Yes. Whether he'd be able to cast any cleric spells afterward is a different issue (and up to the DM).
 

Its the whole divine vs arcane thing. Druids can't cast spells of opposing alignments either, so I'd tend to assume the plethora of prestige/alternate base classes would have the same sort of restrictions depending on their caster type
 

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top